The FSR Thread (Announcements & Discussion)

Helldivers 2 might be a bad example, not sure it even has FSR 1 and likely won't get any upscalers at all. As the developer has said outright that they think the game doesn't need it.

*The late edit*
You can see the list of FSR 2/3 games in the below URL. Little over 40+ listed for FSR 3.

Latest AMD FSR 2 & 3 Supported Games List

As some of you may know, we have been highlighting the latest updates to AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution1 technology over the last couple of months. The latest version, AMD FSR 3, transforms gaming experiences with massive and responsive framerates in supported games using a combination of super...
community.amd.com community.amd.com

But games still releasing with 2.x can make sense. Games can have long development cycles and priorities might not favour improving or updating whatever up-scaling they selected.
 
Last edited:
I guess the possibility of Helldivers 2 using FSR 1 for its scaling feature was speculation—just something I had read a few places. And yeah, it's not the most demanding game out there so scaling is less impactful there than it is in other titles.

I imagine it will catch up eventually, but the adoption rate of newer versions of FSR is still disappointing (roughly half of the games listed for FSR3 on that page have either yet to be released or haven't been updated with it yet). Granted, it's not has if most older DLSS titles have been updated to DLSS 3+ either (not counting unofficial support), so the problem isn't exclusive to FSR. While I can understand the business reasons for it, as an end-user it can still be irksome to not be able to take advantage of improvements made to image quality and/or performance in newer iterations of FSR—especially knowing that these days developers are specifically designing titles with upscaling in mind.
 
Last edited:
There are tools, & mods, out there that can wrap upscaling standards from one to another and improve aspects of the image quality. So if 3.1 really does offer the jump shown... there is a strong chance those tools will let you improve image quality by wrapping FSR 2.x to 3.1.

Sadly most of those tools are either payware, or not free yet. Like those from PureDark and LukeFZ.

*late edit*
Worth noting the LukeFZ has said he wants to make his tool free once it's complete. Right now it's pay access for the betas. Plus all of this is open source, so it's very possible for others to code methods... or if AMD wanted to pull a sweet move... building in a driver function to wrap FSR 2.x to newer versions would be cool...
 
Last edited:
store.steampowered.com

Fort Solis - Performance Patch is here! - Steam News

🚀Dear Fort Solis fans🚀 We are aware that some of you are still experiencing performance issues within the game and it heavily influences the overral experience. Our goal has always been to ensure smooth gameplay for all our players, regardless of their hardware specifications. With this patch...
store.steampowered.com store.steampowered.com

Here is the full patch breakdown:
    • General performance optimizations and improvements
    • FSR3 support added
    • Enable toggle on/off on speed walk
    • Fixed crash on save load
Click to expand...

 
steamcommunity.com

Steam :: Lords of the Fallen :: Lords of the Fallen: VERSION 1.5 - 'Master of Fate' OUT NOW

Greetings Lampbearers, Today marks the arrival of Version 1.5 - Master of Fate, the culmination of over 30 updates released since launch, resulting in significantly improved performance, stability and optimisation, alongside rigorous difficulty balancing in response to your feedback. As part of...
steamcommunity.com steamcommunity.com

Lords of the Fallen: VERSION 1.5 - 'Master of Fate' said:
Patch v1.5.17 - Additional Updates

AMD FSR3
  • Players can now make use of AMD's latest FSR version.
Click to expand...
 
Ghost of Tsushima comes rocketing in with a custom FSR 3 implementation to decouple FSR 3 Frame Generation ahead of it becoming offical with FSR 3.1. Allowing use of the feature with whatever you want

https://twitter.com/x/status/1791131991447879858

Ghost of Tsushima Director's Cut - PCGamingWiki PCGW - bugs, fixes, crashes, mods, guides and improvements for every PC game

www.pcgamingwiki.com www.pcgamingwiki.com

There is some discussion however of it currently causing crashing... but mad props to the team at Nixxes for some talented work on just doing it themselves. We all look forward to them patching out the issues 👍
 
I've got the game installed and all set up. Just haven't had time to start it yet today. Was cool to see FSR3 options in there.
 
How to enable FSR 2.x in Assassin's Creed Valhalla
By Trunks0 - www.Rage3D.com
(version 1.0 - Release)
(version 1.0.1 - Corrected location info in step 3)
UPDATE: Upon closer inspection this doesn't seem to actually work. It just renders at native when the below is put in place.

What you need
DLSS2FSR by Potato of Doom (AKA CyberFSR2)
DLSS .dll. As AC:Valhalla doesn't have one.
(Mostly because they have not officially enabled or released the feature yet. Hence why DLSS is in the games menu, but can't be enabled... keep reading we get around that)
(I used DLSS 2.5.1. We are converting to FSR 2.x here, so DLSS version is not as important, so long as it works)

What to do
1) Place your files. Put the DLSS2FSR2 files and your DLSS.dll into your AC: Valhalla install directory (ie where ACValhalla.exe is located).
  • nvngx.dll
  • nvngx.ini
  • EnableSignatureOverride.reg
  • nvngx_dlss.dll
2) Run the "EnableSignatureOverride.reg" file
3) Find the AC: Valhalla settings *.ini file
  • Name: ACValhalla.ini

4) Edit this file to enable DLSS. Look for UpsampleType and set it 2 like below and save the file
  • UpsampleType=2
This may also work for enabling DLSS in AC Valhalla. Just don't put in the the files for DLSS2FSR. Play around and let me know how it goes for you guys.
 
Last edited:
devblogs.microsoft.com

DirectSR Preview Available Now - DirectX Developer Blog

In the evolving landscape of Super Resolution (SR), GPU hardware vendors have set the stage with their respective technologies – AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution, Intel XeSS, and NVIDIA DLSS Super Resolution. These cutting-edge solutions elevate the gaming experience by boosting frame rates...
devblogs.microsoft.com devblogs.microsoft.com

In the evolving landscape of Super Resolution (SR), GPU hardware vendors have set the stage with their respective technologies – AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution, Intel XeSS, and NVIDIA DLSS Super Resolution. These cutting-edge solutions elevate the gaming experience by boosting frame rates while maintaining exceptional visual quality. Yet as the number of SR variants continues to grow, developers are in search of a common SR API that will seamlessly scale across the hardware ecosystem. Today, we are thrilled to announce the preview release of DirectSR, a new API designed to standardize SR support in D3D12 titles.

At the heart of DirectSR lies our collaboration with AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA. Together, we’ve built this API to seamlessly leverage the capabilities of their in-market upscaling technologies. DirectSR enables multi-vendor SR through a common set of inputs and outputs, allowing a single code path to exercise DLSS Super Resolution, FidelityFX™ Super Resolution, and XeSS. By exposing these technologies under one interface, SR integration becomes straightforward and scalable – developers can implement once and ship SR across the broad landscape of Windows devices!
Click to expand...

Will be interesting to see how this actually pans out. It will still require developers to QA their implementations, but may lead to more developers including all upscalers. Imho it sorta feels like a half-measure vs just standardizing how DX handles upscaling entirely. But so be it for now.
 
Did someone forget to give the media a heads-up on the 3.1 release?


Here's an extremely low quality unlisted official vid from amd.

But you can still see that there is less ghosting on the machine to the right, Immortals of Aveum needs 3.1 ASAP, that game had ghosting all over the place with FSR 3/2.X.
 
Whole bunch of side-by-sides. Notably... the big clank robot float near the end of the clips he's used for the side-by-side's looks massively better in 3.1 compared to 2.2.

 
Still wondering how much resources you need for a given level of pict quality in upscaling from one vendor to the next. Im thinking AMD is more efficient in that dept but any analysis would be nice so that maybe the winning tech in the future leaves room on the die for other things from AI to RT... For ex for a long time we had better raster perf from a smaller die on amd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top