MasterGoa
New member
RX 480 leads 1060 my 13 FPS in CoD:IW
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_page...e_warfare_pc_graphics_benchmark_review,6.html
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_page...e_warfare_pc_graphics_benchmark_review,6.html
The importance of drivers...
- Thread starter MasterGoa
- Start date
Hapatingjaky
New member
Could it be that AMD is going to stop supporting older GCN arch's and focus more on Polaris and Vega?
SoCalMX70
New member
Did these guys use the AMD drivers that came out YESTERDAY that support this game?
Edit: Found the system page. They did. Really odd to see the FuryX where it's at in 1080p. Pulls away at higher res and even beats/ties the 1070 at 4k though.
ShaidarHaran
New member
1080p results are CPU-bound. Look at the Titan XP results. Same FPS @ 1080p and 1440p. You have to look at the 1440p numbers to get any idea of GPU-scaling in this game. Fury is faster than 480 @ 1440p, albeit not by as much as you might expect. Definitely points to driver optimization.
Game has a 125 fps cap.
ShaidarHaran
New member
According to the author. It could be a CPU-limitation. Either way, the Titan XP hits the same FPS @ 1080p and 1440p indicating it's hitting a bottleneck.
MasterGoa
New member
Titanfall seems to be VERY Amd optimized:
https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz...tanfall_2_pc_titan_nie_jest_wymagany?page=0,6
Also, RX480 outperforms 390X...
https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz...tanfall_2_pc_titan_nie_jest_wymagany?page=0,6
Also, RX480 outperforms 390X...
ShaidarHaran
New member
Yes, it does. Being a console port that's not too surprising.
Again @ 1080p. Did you read my last post?
combined effort of better driver and a better tech with Polaris.
480 improved dx11 and did show amd did things right this round with the design to go after the low end 480 crowd instead of fighting the 1080.
Vega comes and if it beats the 1080 suddenly amd have a great year.
Maxwell gets slower with every new driver just like Kepler before itStill crazy to see the 4GB fury X beating a 12GB Titan XM @ 4k. I believe everyone said the fury X will fail because of its 4GB of ram and would not work well in 4k and in future games.
Maxwell gets slower with every new driver just like Kepler before it
no it doesn't
t0adp1p3
New member
I get happier every day with my cards, CFX support has been phenomenal lately. No point in upgrading they perform so well.
MasterGoa
New member
And 1440 and 4K... They are just about equal.
No one would have guessed this just 2 months ago.
ShaidarHaran
New member
Except that's not true. Go select the 1440p and 4k selections from the drop down list.
1440p:
390x: 56.0, 59.1
480: 55.0, 58.0
3840x1440:
390x: 37.2, 35.0
480: 36.3, 34.0
You're probably looking at the *regular* 390 FPS in those later charts, which does indeed score a bit lower.
ShaidarHaran
New member
MasterGoa
New member
No it is not, you quote my post. Read the post you quoted...
2 months ago, no one would assume a 480 would reach a 390X in performance.
Here it is.
Why? Because of driver, and game, optimization, which confirms the forward looking value of Polaris.
ShaidarHaran
New member
K buddy. I directly quoted you twice now. You said "480 faster than 390x" and responded to said comment with information directly from the source *you* cited showing how that is NOT the case.
There's nothing more to say.
MasterGoa
New member
K buddy. I directly quoted you twice now. You said "480 faster than 390x" and responded to said comment with information directly from the source *you* cited showing how that is NOT the case.
There's nothing more to say.
MasterGoa said:
?
This whole thread is about how Polaris performance improved significantly with drivers and in this case, game optimization.
480 beats 390X at 1080P and equals it at 1440P and 4K.
Indeed there is nothing more to say