Elysian
SCAATSJW
The same reason anything big changes.... money.
I'll believe it when they announce it.
The same reason anything big changes.... money.
I'm sure people said the same about Windows back in the day and how they would never consider locking applications in a walled garden like Apple.I'll believe it when they announce it.
I'm sure people said the same about Windows back in the day and how they would never consider locking applications in a walled garden like Apple.
And behold, Microsoft Store is just the first step. Eventually Windows will turn into PaaS and many important applications will be made store only, quoting "security" issues.
The same reason anything big changes.... money.
Not alot of things google does for "money". Their forte isn't exactly the evil empire that swings their decisions by money. They have enough, and enough flowing in. Sideloading is one of Androids strongest, if not the strongest point.
I think it'll stay.
The same reason anything big changes.... money.
Google isn't going to upend their whole business model for a flash-in-the-pan fad like Fortnite. People only play Fortnite because it's a free-to-play clone of the PUBG fad. Most of the mobile Fortnite players will be from China where Google Play is banned anyway.
... This is going to open a whole new can of worms for android phones. Top virus makers are salivating at this right now.
Do you think Google is going to sit by idly and let companies do this in the future if more big name publishers start bypassing Google Play?
Soon you'll find yourself in a situation where you can no longer install non-store signed applications.
If that happens, then Android has lost its purpose and people might as well by iPhones. The openness of Android is what attracts people. It Google locks it up, Android will loose its attractiveness.
But I expect Android development will get forked and worked on by other parties then.
Hahaha, pwned!
But it's worth noting that this flaw falls under Google's zero-day disclosure policy in which if it believes the flaw is a dangerous enough it will only provide a 7-day deadline for software firms to patch the bug.
Seems important.