3dMark 2001 scores

3DMark2001 3375
FSB@120 MEM>@160 ATHLON 700@900
RADEON 210/210 7072

My System
Asus K7V
ATI RADEON DDR 64 driver 7072
Sound Blaster Live value with X GAMER DRIVERS
IBM DESKSTAR 75GXP 30.7GB 7200rpm DTLA-307030
128MB PC133 HYUNDAI
CAMBRIDGE SOUNDWORKS DTT 2500 DIGITAL THEATER 5.1

Operating System Microsoft Windows 98se
DirectX Version 8.00
Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Mobo Model <K7V>
CPU AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 900MHz FSB 120 MHz
3D Accelerator RADEON DDR 64
Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON DDR
Driver Version 4.13.7072
Video Memory 64 MB
Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Memory 128 MB Z-Buffer Depth 32bit
Texture Format Compressed FSAA Disabled
Rendering Pipeline D3D Hardware T&L

3DMark Result
(3D marks) 3375

Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail
(FPS) 55.9

Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail
(FPS) 19.2

Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail
(FPS) 59.1

Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail
(FPS) 31.6

Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail
(FPS) 62.1

Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail
(FPS) 29.4


Compare URL
» http://gamershq.madonion.com/compar...k1.shtml?489502
 
Jack_Beans said:
All In Wonder Radeon , Radeon LE, Radeon Vivo , Radeon "I don't know what"...............
Totally Lost ...

I'm planning to get a Radeon for games and multimedia purposes , but which one to get ????????
And a 32, 64 or xxx ????

Please can anyone clarify things for me ????

Thanx
Click to expand...

Any Radeon will do, just make sure it's DDR (important for 32-bit games) and be sure to have at least VO (Tv-Out)

And here's my score: 2426

TBird 900@918 Mhz, 256 Mb PC-133 RAM, Radeon 32 SDR@171/171Mhz (should've gotten a DDR :))
 
3DMark2001 3455
FSB@120 MEM>@160 ATHLON 700@900
RADEON 225/210 7072

My System
Asus K7V
ATI RADEON DDR 64 driver 7072
Sound Blaster Live value with X GAMER DRIVERS
IBM DESKSTAR 75GXP 30.7GB 7200rpm DTLA-307030
128MB PC133 HYUNDAI
CAMBRIDGE SOUNDWORKS DTT 2500 DIGITAL THEATER 5.1

Operating System Microsoft Windows 98se
DirectX Version 8.00
Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Mobo Model <K7V>
CPU AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 900MHz FSB 120 MHz
3D Accelerator RADEON DDR 64
Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON DDR
Driver Version 4.13.7072
Video Memory 64 MB
Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Memory 128 MB Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Texture Format Compressed FSAA Disabled
Rendering Pipeline D3D Hardware T&L

3DMark Result
(3D marks) 3455
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail
(FPS) 58.9
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail
(FPS) 18.6
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail
(FPS) 62.1
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail
(FPS) 31.4
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail
(FPS) 64.5
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail
(FPS) 30.0
Game 4 - Nature
(FPS) Not available
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing)
(MTexels/s) 332.3
1 Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing)
(MTexels/s) 942.4
High Polygon Count (1 Light)
(MTriangles/s) 5.9
High Polygon Count (8 Lights)
(MTriangles/s) 2.5
Environment Bump Mapping
(FPS) 85.6
DOT3 Bump Mapping
(FPS) 57.5
Vertex Shader Speed
(FPS) 30.8
Pixel Shader Speed
(FPS) Not available
Point Sprite Speed
(MSprites/s) .2


http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?534594 </compare2k1.shtml?534594>
 
Who cares about 3d mark scores, they mean jack. They don't teall you anything about real world performance. If you want to post some benchmarks that truely show how good your card is, then show some Quake 3! Booya! :D
 
Q3 suckah

Q3 suckah

3DMark is free, Quake 3 isn't... And the only ones complaining about 3DMark scores "not meaning jack" are the ones with slow machines. Didn't you have the guts to show your score? :D
 
went from 1820 to 2850 without any tweaks whatsoever. Just a change from 600 too 800MHz and new mobo, MSI to ASUS CUSL2. Not bad if i say so myself. Not sure if i'm going to play with the tweaks now.....looks to good in Nascar4 and Rune:cool: :cool: :rolleyes:
 
:D
I have the highest 3Dmark2001 score for ANY cpu at 1100Mhz or less with a Radeon vcard! It is a P3 933 OC to 1099Mhz.
The score is 3748 and was posted a month ago and hasn't been beat yet! I thought those T-Birds were so great - guess I was wrong.
 
oh no... not you again... i thought we explained this to you. your scores had much more to do with the fact that your vid card overclocks much more than most. if you put your card in a 1.1 ghz athlon system, which has twice the bus speed, so i promise you, it's faster, you'd watch your score get whomped. of course you'd never do that because you are obsessed with 3dmark and couldn't stand to be beat.

why don't you show off your sandra cpu scores? why don't you brag about a benchmark that actually tests your cpu and not your video card? is that because even a slower rated athlon will beat the **** out you? if you can actually use a REAL cpu benchmark, i'll gladly show you mine in sandra 2001 smashing a 1.6 ghz P4, and any P3... i thought those pentiums were so great- guess i was wrong.
 
orb
 
I cri everytiem...can't get it to run cause it says it cant find mmx !___!
 
I got 81314 with my Ryzen 5900X and RTX 3080.

Looks to be 100% CPU limited, running on only a single core and the GPU barely even utilized on most tests.

FPS is now well over 1000 on a most of the tests. And it all looks so bad... I remember when this looked impressive. :cry:

Considering it's recently been discovered that Nvidia has slightly higher CPU driver overhead, Crawdaddy79's higher score probably reflects being on a Radeon 5700XT instead. Granted, I didn't bother closing any programs before running the test either.

Still a good blast from the past! :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top