SSXeon
CAPS CAPS CAPS
The first video of his that I watched, he claimed that he had a source at Nvidia and he was 95% confident that the info was correct. In that video he stated that:
The 3090 had 12GB of VRAM at 18GB/s speeds(Actually has 24GB at 19.5 GB/s speeds)
The 3090 was 7nm. (Is actually 8nm)
The 3090 had 5,376 cuda cores (actually has 5,248 with double FP32=10946)
3090 sample consumed 220 to 230 watts. (Actually 350watt TDP)
4x the ray tracing performance. (Actually 2X)
4X to 5X the performance of a Titan RTX in the game Minecraft. (Actually 2X to 3X)
He was waaaaaaay off on all of this.
Here is a link to his video. He updated his information based on what other rumors were stating and had no real info. His source was playing him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCPufeQmFJk
Things change and nobody expects his predictions to be perfect but his source was totally off on everything.
Yes this is what AIBs and other sources give people. I am just saying that different samples are different then actual final chips. His ONE source was off, that happens A LOT. He also said 3090 would have 21Gb/s chips, and he was wrong.
Do we know for sure its 8nm? It was 7nm right before launch because press info was given as the 5284 and 4352 as the cards cuda numbers and samsung 7nm (can't confirm).
As Steve from GN, said it can do FP+FP or FP+INT. Is that a fact? Well a 30TF FP32 3080 would be 2x faster than a 2080Ti, and that is not the case.