Or, the market place deems they're too expensive. Consumers have the real power and there is still demand and not a buying wall of resistance.
I would put my money I could tell you the difference between a 60 and 100Hz monitor over and over and over and over. Going from my PG279Q to a 100Hz ultrawide is insanely noticeable.
What the hell is the point of gaming at 4K if you’re going to lower settings. That’s asinine. Higher resolution I can’t run, so I set my texture detail down to medium! Sick
You're right I don't expect next gen to be any cheaper but at least it'll be a massive jump over Pascal.
There will always be demand for the best and fastest.
Not if it's priced too high.
I can understand paying a premium for the ti for 4k gaming but i have trouble understanding paying a premium for 1440p gaming and overkill to me.
It's noticeable as i mentioned but more-so diminishing returns than insanely noticeable to me. You're so close minded to think that 4k with a setting sacrifice may be superior than 1440p with settings maxed.
You’re close-minded to think that there’s diminishing returns to raising framerate and increasing the smoothness on your screen.
And yeah, I’m sorry but if you’re running 4K and you lower texture settings .. that is so completely backwards I am incredibly mind-blown.
You’re close-minded to think that there’s diminishing returns to raising framerate and increasing the smoothness on your screen.
And yeah, I’m sorry but if you’re running 4K and you lower texture settings .. that is so completely backwards I am incredibly mind-blown.
If you think it is a must have, good have fun, it is more-so diminishing returns after 60 for me and rather use the precious resources on fidelity, immersion and resolution.
There are many settings to try to find that right fidelity/performance/setting/resolution balance depending on game and subjective tastes.
There are many settings to try to find that right fidelity/performance/setting/resolution balance depending on game and subjective tastes.