Cyberpunk 2077 - civil, happy, non insulting thread.

SirBaron

SirBaron

Emperor LOLpatine
IT doesn't matter what you believe to be true, or if someone else somehow says something you "know" is bull, take a breath and talk normally, don't antagonise people, d, happynt directly insult people.

AMD, Nvidia, Intel or whatever it doesn't matter its goddamn HARDWARE. Stop acting like its us vs them like you're some sort of tribe it's embarrassing to say the least.

Discuss things like you're talking to your best friends, there's enough ass holes In the world we don't need to create that on here.

We know who the usual suspects are, if you carry on you've been warned.
 
Last edited:
225k is still good for a sp game that only lasts like 40 hours?

Losing people isn't great, but many developers would kill for 225k concurrent players.
 
Drexion said:
What a ridiculous clickbait title. This is perfectly normal for a single player game. People complete it, uninstall, then wait for the expansions.
Click to expand...

With a game like this though you’d be doing multiple playthroughs. The cut content + bugs is clearly causing some folks to not attempt that at this time.
 
Is there any reason to do multiple playthroughs when a leads to b.

There is almost zero choice in this game, sure you could choose different skills, but usually it comes Down to pew pew. :p
 
SirBaron said:
Is there any reason to do multiple playthroughs when a leads to b.

There is almost zero choice in this game, sure you could choose different skills, but usually it comes Down to pew pew. :p
Click to expand...

And that is one of the big reasons why I haven't bought this game. Sounds like it's just an FPS that really isn't an RPG. And since I have never been a huge fan of FPS, I don't like spending more than $20 for them. So I am waiting until I can get CP2077, with all expansions included, for $20.
 
I'm a fan of the game but I don't see any problem with people waiting for it to be patched up before playing. I'm one of those players who plans to play it again but I'm going to wait a few months before doing so myself.

There are choices to be made in this game though. For example, I chose to save someone who showed up in one of the endings and wouldn't have otherwise. I also chose to befriend someone which unlocked a secret ending. There is a bit of dialogue options that are trapped behind life paths and skill sets as well but those don't directly effect where the story is going. You can be rude and fixers will comment on it in later missions ect.

I fail to see how this game's story is any less effected by your actions than the Witcher 3. The Witcher 3's main story is a little longer so it has a little more instances where you can effect the story by nature of the story length but I wouldn't consider the story effecting decisions to be any more or less game changing and at times there are skill checks that are more a part of the game than TW3 had. Just my thoughts on it. I really don't think this game is a step backward from TW3 in any major way. It has a great story, 3x as much gameplay options and similar role playing options and a similar amount of content just distributed differently. Less main story and more side quests. CDPR's side quests are done with the same quality as the main story so it's not a problem, it helps people finish the game who probably wouldn't have otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Exposed said:
Unfortunately CD Project already got their money from them.
Click to expand...

I agree, that is why I only pre order a week in advance so I can pre download the game. Giving CDPR 8 million pre orders a year before the game was finished gave their upper management a free pass to ship it with more bugs and less polishing. If they deliver a polished product because they don't know how well it will sell then that works out in favor of gamers.
 
SirBaron said:
Is there any reason to do multiple playthroughs when a leads to b.

There is almost zero choice in this game, sure you could choose different skills, but usually it comes Down to pew pew. :p
Click to expand...

In an RPG? Usually, yes. This one - hard nope.
 
Cyko said:
Were refunds only offered on consoles or did it extend to the pc as well?
Click to expand...

I think Steam has the usual period where you can play for a few hours and decide to return it but I don't know if they extended it in this case. CDPR did state that 13 million gamers kept the game after returns were offered though.
 
Cyko said:
Were refunds only offered on consoles or did it extend to the pc as well?
Click to expand...


If you bought the game on GOG then CD project had a generous refund policy. But Steam users (where most of it sold) were basically out of luck, Steam won't do a refund if you played more than 2 hours and I don't think there were any special arrangements between CD project and Steam.
 
Exposed said:
If you bought the game on GOG then CD project had a generous refund policy. But Steam users (where most of it sold) were basically out of luck, Steam won't do a refund if you played more than 2 hours and I don't think there were any special arrangements between CD project and Steam.
Click to expand...

and it took 2+ hours to do character creation and 2 more playing with game settings :lol:
 
Baron owes me a post since he deleted it in the last thread so here it is +1

btw i was just joking around in that post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top