AMD Catalyst Omega Performance Analysis with R9 290X at 4K
- Thread starter badsykes
- Start date
I would have thought that performance scaling in 4K from 1 card to a 2 card setup, would have provided a much larger gain at that resolution, regardless of drivers used but the Fps isn't much to boast about....Hardly ever hits 60 Fps average.
Oh well, that's what 4 cards are for...
Oh well, that's what 4 cards are for...
t0adp1p3
New member
I would have thought that performance scaling in 4K from 1 card to a 2 card setup, would have provided a much larger gain at that resolution, regardless of drivers used but the Fps isn't much to boast about....Hardly ever hits 60 Fps average.
Oh well, that's what 4 cards are for...
Always manage to squeeze in you have 4 cards no matter how irrelevant it is to the subject lol.
Not really, it's just that it looks like 2 cards isn't really enough for a 4K monitor even with the latest drivers, and it seems the minimums are worse with the crossfire setup too, which i though was something solved quite a while ago.....
t0adp1p3
New member
no really you say it in every post.
WaltC
New member
I would have thought that performance scaling in 4K from 1 card to a 2 card setup, would have provided a much larger gain at that resolution, regardless of drivers used but the Fps isn't much to boast about....Hardly ever hits 60 Fps average.
Oh well, that's what 4 cards are for...
Heh...
If ever there might actually be a case to make for a 4x X-fire system, 4k + resolutions would probably be it... Otherwise, from what I've seen, the scaling drops like a stone once you pass that third gpu, and sometimes even past just the second gpu. Anyone with 4x X-fire is someone I'd call an enthusiast with a capital "E," though....!