Yes means the same thing as I said.
THE Benchmark Thread
- Thread starter acroig
- Start date
acroig
Just another Troll
Of course! Yet this thread was intended mostly for our own user benchmarks rather than professional reviews/benchies.
andino
Jackass Extraordinaire
The 3080 is apparently slower than the 1080ti SLI I have in Time Spy and Firestrike.
Guru 3d has Firestrike Ultra at 10667 on the 3080.
I'm clocking in at 11939. 10.56% faster.
Time Spy at Guru3d on a 3080 is 15034.
My 1080ti benchmark score is 17134. 12.25% faster.
Granted that is a SLI score and there are very few games that support that. But still....
Guru 3d has Firestrike Ultra at 10667 on the 3080.
I'm clocking in at 11939. 10.56% faster.
Time Spy at Guru3d on a 3080 is 15034.
My 1080ti benchmark score is 17134. 12.25% faster.
Granted that is a SLI score and there are very few games that support that. But still....
OverclockN'
Well-known member
I saw the same thing with all the review results on the 3080. The vast majority of the games that supported SLI were slower than 2x1080Ti Strix.
I recently played a bunch of games using this SLI config when I got the 2nd card 8-10 months ago. Still fresh in memory. Even had it working in Resident Evil 2 and a couple other more recent titles.
I recently played a bunch of games using this SLI config when I got the 2nd card 8-10 months ago. Still fresh in memory. Even had it working in Resident Evil 2 and a couple other more recent titles.
Fire Strike
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23516747
3DMark Score: 30078
Graphics Score: 42003
Physics Score: 24571
Combined Score: 10769
Graphics Test 1: 209.54 fps
Graphics Test 2: 161.83 fps
Physics Test: 78.0 fps
Combined Test: 50.09 fps
Time Spy
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13951306
3DMark Score: 15965
Graphics Score: 17683
CPU Score: 10299
Graphics Test 1: 116.65 fps
Graphics Test 2: 100.32 fps
CPU Test: 34.6 fps
Port Royal
https://www.3dmark.com/pr/311578
3DMark Score: 11181
Graphics Score: 11181
Graphics Test: 51.77 fps
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23516747
3DMark Score: 30078
Graphics Score: 42003
Physics Score: 24571
Combined Score: 10769
Graphics Test 1: 209.54 fps
Graphics Test 2: 161.83 fps
Physics Test: 78.0 fps
Combined Test: 50.09 fps
Time Spy
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/13951306
3DMark Score: 15965
Graphics Score: 17683
CPU Score: 10299
Graphics Test 1: 116.65 fps
Graphics Test 2: 100.32 fps
CPU Test: 34.6 fps
Port Royal
https://www.3dmark.com/pr/311578
3DMark Score: 11181
Graphics Score: 11181
Graphics Test: 51.77 fps
Trying out some Quake 2 RTX
1080p: 110-120 fps
1440p: 65-70 fps
2160p: 30-33 fps
1080p: 110-120 fps
1440p: 65-70 fps
2160p: 30-33 fps
acroig
Just another Troll
Not bad!
OverclockN'
Well-known member
What, 33fps in Quake 2 with RTX?? 
acroig
Just another Troll
What, 33fps in Quake 2 with RTX??
Well yeah, the whole game is Ray traced.
OverclockN'
Well-known member
So is Control, isn't it? Doesn't it run better than that without DLSS?
Q2 RTX is full global illumination path tracing (like Minecraft RTX). Control and other games are hybrids with ray-traced effects alongside normal rasterization.
acroig
Just another Troll
No, Q2 RTX is 100% ray pathed, control only has certain effects.
acroig
Just another Troll
Yeah, what the man said.
SirBaron
Emperor LOLpatine
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/50916509? +50 core +500 memory, not much of a increase, but free is free. 
SirBaron
Emperor LOLpatine
How did you set it up?
I put global illumination to high, and timedemo 1 demo demo 1
and got average 46fps at 4k
no idea if I need to change anything else.
acroig
Just another Troll
Well I'm doing less that that at 1440 so I'd say that's good.