Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quotes for hard drive storage space are starting to get out of hand

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Quotes for hard drive storage space are starting to get out of hand

    So I'm in the market for a 1 tera hard drive. After some look see, I see that it's really only ~930 gigs of real estate to use. Now, I understand why there is a difference between what's on the box and what I actually get, but seriously, we need a new way of determining space. I mean that's 70 gigs chopped off right there! That's indeed alot of space I could be using
    What's next 2 tera's only affording me 1.75 tera's (missing 250 gigs!)???



    /rant over.
    Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 | Core i7 Kaby Lake 2.8GHz | 16GB DDR4 RAM | Geforce 1050M | 1TB Samsung 960 EVO
    Camera: Nikon D750 | 24mm f/1.8G | 35mm f/1.8G | 50mm f/1.8G | 85mm f/1.8G


    My life is dope and I do dope sht.

    #2
    Just how big, exactly, is your porn collection?
    "She's so fat, the escape velocity at her surface exceeds 3*10^8 m/s."
    ~ Stephen Hawking on your mom.

    Comment


      #3
      Theres a 7% less actual space then is says on the box. Next time keep that number in mind

      The formula is 1-(1000^3) / (1024^3)
      Don't panic

      Comment


        #4
        You're not losing anything.
        You got 1,000,000,000,000 bytes did you not?
        Mayonaise!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by pixie69 View Post
          Just how big, exactly, is your porn collection?
          not as big as magicknights.
          Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 | Core i7 Kaby Lake 2.8GHz | 16GB DDR4 RAM | Geforce 1050M | 1TB Samsung 960 EVO
          Camera: Nikon D750 | 24mm f/1.8G | 35mm f/1.8G | 50mm f/1.8G | 85mm f/1.8G


          My life is dope and I do dope sht.

          Comment


            #6
            Look at the General Hardware important info sticky, under 'Hard Drives'


            EDIT - I thought you were good with numbers and stuff. and junk.

            Comment


              #7
              I agree with the orig poster, does this problem apply to Flash and SSD's?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by caveman-jim View Post
                Look at the General Hardware important info sticky, under 'Hard Drives'


                EDIT - I thought you were good with numbers and stuff. and junk.
                i am to an extent, but that doesn't mean i'm happy with the way things are being advertised as we move up into higher capacities.
                Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 | Core i7 Kaby Lake 2.8GHz | 16GB DDR4 RAM | Geforce 1050M | 1TB Samsung 960 EVO
                Camera: Nikon D750 | 24mm f/1.8G | 35mm f/1.8G | 50mm f/1.8G | 85mm f/1.8G


                My life is dope and I do dope sht.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Idle Wild View Post
                  I agree with the orig poster, does this problem apply to Flash and SSD's?
                  No.
                  [ [email protected] / TRUE | [email protected]| Gigabyte X38-DS5 | 7280GB storage | GTX460 @ 825/2100MHz || Samsung 2232BW 22" ]

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Razeus View Post
                    i am to an extent, but that doesn't mean i'm happy with the way things are being advertised as we move up into higher capacities.
                    You misunderstand the problem. The problem is all the stupid programs that keep clinging on to kilo-, mega-, giga-, tera-, etc byte as powers of 2. While in science these prefixes denote a power of 10.
                    A gigawatt is a gigawatt just like a gigabyte is a gigabyte. You are getting what is advertised, that is 10^12 bytes.
                    Mayonaise!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                      You misunderstand the problem. The problem is all the stupid programs that keep clinging on to kilo-, mega-, giga-, tera-, etc byte as powers of 2.
                      the prefixes arent different, its just a matter of bits vs bytes.
                      What you perceive to be, is your reality.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                        You misunderstand the problem. The problem is all the stupid programs that keep clinging on to kilo-, mega-, giga-, tera-, etc byte as powers of 2. While in science these prefixes denote a power of 10.
                        A gigawatt is a gigawatt just like a gigabyte is a gigabyte. You are getting what is advertised, that is 10^12 bytes.
                        Lmao, you have no idea why its to the power of 2 huh? It's more of a hardware issue
                        Don't panic

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I vaguely recall reading that all hard drive manufactures are required to indicate the actual formatted capacity on the packaging.
                          "The history of intellectual progress is written in the lives of infidels."

                          - Robert Ingersoll (1833 - 1899)

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                            You misunderstand the problem. The problem is all the stupid programs that keep clinging on to kilo-, mega-, giga-, tera-, etc byte as powers of 2. While in science these prefixes denote a power of 10.
                            Yeah, these stupid programs! Powers of 2?? I mean, you'd think that computers operated in binary or something.
                            Firestorm_Rising

                            Comment


                              #15
                              except for the fact that kilo means thousand, mega means million, giga means billion, and tera means trillion. computers aren't exempt. if i'm in the market for a 1TB hard drive, should i expect anything other than 1 trillion bytes?

                              Comment


                                #16
                                Originally posted by Ryoko View Post
                                except for the fact that kilo means thousand, mega means million, giga means billion, and tera means trillion. computers aren't exempt. if i'm in the market for a 1TB hard drive, should i expect anything other than 1 trillion bytes?

                                kilo = 1000 in a base 10 system
                                Don't panic

                                Comment


                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Tisti View Post
                                  Lmao, you have no idea why its to the power of 2 huh?
                                  Enlighten me
                                  It's more of a hardware issue
                                  Depends on what issue you're talking about exactly.
                                  I'm on about consumers getting confused and thinking they somehow lost disk space.
                                  Mayonaise!

                                  Comment


                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by phial View Post
                                    the prefixes arent different, its just a matter of bits vs bytes.
                                    Care to elaborate?
                                    Mayonaise!

                                    Comment


                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Tisti View Post
                                      kilo = 1000 in a base 10 system
                                      binary = bits

                                      base 10 = bytes.

                                      if bytes were base 2, then kilo would be 8

                                      Comment


                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Ryoko View Post
                                        binary = bits

                                        base 10 = bytes.

                                        if bytes were base 2, then kilo would be 8
                                        What the hell?

                                        1 byte = 8 bits

                                        Edit:
                                        Must say, I like this thread
                                        Last edited by Tizen; Feb 19, 2008, 10:00 AM.
                                        Don't panic

                                        Comment


                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Firestorm_ATI View Post
                                          Yeah, these stupid programs! Powers of 2?? I mean, you'd think that computers operated in binary or something.
                                          Are you a computer? I'm a lot more comfortable with powers of 10 compared to powers of 2.
                                          I got a terabyte drive, I got 1,000,000,000,000 bytes, easy.
                                          I got a terabyte drive, I got 1024*1024*1024*1024 bytes errrr ah yes 1099511627776 bytes. Now there's an easy number.

                                          There is no added value in using powers of 2 to represent file size or disk sizes, so why use it?
                                          Mayonaise!

                                          Comment


                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                            Are you a computer? I'm a lot more comfortable with powers of 10 compared to powers of 2.
                                            I got a terabyte drive, I got 1,000,000,000,000 bytes, easy.
                                            I got a terabyte drive, I got 1024*1024*1024*1024 bytes errrr ah yes 1099511627776 bytes. Now there's an easy number.

                                            There is no added value in using powers of 2 to represent file size or disk sizes, so why use it?
                                            because microsoft uses it

                                            we all know how standard microsoft is

                                            Comment


                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                              Are you a computer? I'm a lot more comfortable with powers of 10 compared to powers of 2.
                                              I got a terabyte drive, I got 1,000,000,000,000 bytes, easy.
                                              I got a terabyte drive, I got 1024*1024*1024*1024 bytes errrr ah yes 1099511627776 bytes. Now there's an easy number.

                                              There is no added value in using powers of 2 to represent file size or disk sizes, so why use it?
                                              NIST and IEEE 1541: powers of two = first 2 letters closest SI designation + bi.
                                              kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera = 10^3, 10^6, 10^9, and 10^12
                                              Kibi, Mebi, Gibi, Tebi= 2^10, 2^20, 2^30, and 2^40 respectively

                                              1 terabtye=1x10^12 bytes
                                              1 tebibyte=1x2^40 bytes

                                              kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera, etc are SI prefices that unambiguously refer to powers of 10. Any other assumed definition are completely nonstandard, and used only in colloquial speech.

                                              get it?
                                              Last edited by seeker010; Feb 19, 2008, 10:07 AM.
                                              Abort, Retry, Fail?

                                              Comment


                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Tisti View Post
                                                Theres a 7% less actual space then is says on the box. Next time keep that number in mind

                                                The formula is 1-(1000^3) / (1024^3)
                                                right, but power of 3 is for giga. for tera you should use power of 4. that would be 10%.

                                                Comment


                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                                  Enlighten me

                                                  Depends on what issue you're talking about exactly.
                                                  I'm on about consumers getting confused and thinking they somehow lost disk space.
                                                  Meh, someone else has done the enlightening...

                                                  Consumers confused? So what? I don't see a lot of complaning about it tbh
                                                  Don't panic

                                                  Comment


                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                                    You misunderstand the problem. The problem is all the stupid programs that keep clinging on to kilo-, mega-, giga-, tera-, etc byte as powers of 2. While in science these prefixes denote a power of 10.
                                                    A gigawatt is a gigawatt just like a gigabyte is a gigabyte. You are getting what is advertised, that is 10^12 bytes.
                                                    Originally posted by seeker010 View Post
                                                    NIST and IEEE 1541: powers of two = first 2 letters closest SI designation + bi.
                                                    kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera = 10^3, 10^6, 10^9, and 10^12
                                                    Kibi, Mebi, Gibi, Tebi= 2^10, 2^20, 2^30, and 2^40 respectively

                                                    1 terabtye=1x10^12 bytes
                                                    1 tebibyte=1x2^40 bytes

                                                    kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera, etc are SI prefices that unambiguously refer to powers of 10. Any other assumed definition are completely nonstandard, and used only in colloquial speech.

                                                    get it?
                                                    Obviously I do not.

                                                    I do not bring up the kibi, mebi etc stuff because that only confuses people more. It isn't used by microsoft so try telling people it's that way when their computer tells them otherwise. First you have to establish that the computer is wrong, before you bring up the kibis and mebis
                                                    We already have Ryoko on board, he brought up M$.
                                                    Mayonaise!

                                                    Comment


                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Tisti View Post
                                                      Consumers confused? So what? I don't see a lot of complaning about it tbh
                                                      Did you read the OP?
                                                      Mayonaise!

                                                      Comment


                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by MaxSt View Post
                                                        right, but power of 3 is for giga. for tera you should use power of 4. that would be 10%.
                                                        Ah, indeed it is. I guess Razeus is lucky that the drive manufacturers didn't take that into consideration. He would have a 900GB drive right now if they did


                                                        Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                                        Did you read the OP?
                                                        It's a drop in the ocean
                                                        Don't panic

                                                        Comment


                                                          #29
                                                          some of you guys didn't notice it, but seeker ended the thread a little while ago.

                                                          Comment


                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by caveman-jim View Post
                                                            Look at the General Hardware important info sticky, under 'Hard Drives'


                                                            EDIT - I thought you were good with numbers and stuff. and junk.

                                                            He's a finance guy, stick a dollar sign in front of the numbers and he'd be fine.
                                                            "She's so fat, the escape velocity at her surface exceeds 3*10^8 m/s."
                                                            ~ Stephen Hawking on your mom.

                                                            Comment


                                                              #31
                                                              Since when did an 8 bit Byte become base 10? Bytes are just 8 bits, that's it. A "Gigabyte" would therefore be 1,000,000,000 8bit sections. Plus, no hard drive in existance uses "bits" as a measurement, they all use bytes.

                                                              The hard drive industry has already been sued over this, massive class action style. Somehow, in all that court action, they managed to wiggle out of having to change how they advertise capacity sizes. They paid up a small chunck of change and went on doing exactly what they got sued for in the first place.
                                                              If you feel like I'm hurting your wittle feelings too much, refer me to this thread : A new nicer moshpit???
                                                              "Go screw yourself Apple."

                                                              Comment


                                                                #32
                                                                No, they added a disclaimer in the small print on the price of paper you throw away 'advertised capacity may not be accurately reflected in formatted size' or some such.

                                                                Comment


                                                                  #33
                                                                  that's funny... i see a full TB here. actually a bit more...



                                                                  just because MS thinks they can redefine words doesn't mean they're right.
                                                                  Last edited by Ryoko; Feb 19, 2008, 02:21 PM.

                                                                  Comment


                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                                                    Obviously I do not.

                                                                    I do not bring up the kibi, mebi etc stuff because that only confuses people more. It isn't used by microsoft so try telling people it's that way when their computer tells them otherwise. First you have to establish that the computer is wrong, before you bring up the kibis and mebis
                                                                    We already have Ryoko on board, he brought up M$.
                                                                    I didn't mean to direct that response to you, but I hit quote instead of reply to thread. so sue me. actually, please don't, I'm quite short on cash right now. gimme about 2 weeks.
                                                                    Abort, Retry, Fail?

                                                                    Comment


                                                                      #35
                                                                      When in the computer and in the digital world when you speak of SI designiation associated with bytes/bits then the general rule is to use the base 2 system, the kibi/gibi/tebi nomenclature crap has been around for extremly long and almost nobody ever uses it because it simply sounds retarded. Harddrive manufacturers are the only ones who don't follow this "habit".
                                                                      Originally posted by Ryoko View Post
                                                                      that's funny... i see a full TB here. actually a bit more...
                                                                      http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h1.../diskspace.jpg
                                                                      just because MS thinks they can redefine words doesn't mean they're right.
                                                                      Oh quit being a smartass. It's been like that since decades and is way more widespread than the officialized "standard".
                                                                      Originally posted by XSBagage View Post
                                                                      There is no added value in using powers of 2 to represent file size or disk sizes, so why use it?
                                                                      To a normal user it doesn't make sense, but to a programmer / engineer there is no such thing as base 10 in computers.
                                                                      Last edited by Nebuchadnezzar; Feb 19, 2008, 03:04 PM.
                                                                      [ [email protected] / TRUE | [email protected]| Gigabyte X38-DS5 | 7280GB storage | GTX460 @ 825/2100MHz || Samsung 2232BW 22" ]

                                                                      Comment


                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Ryoko View Post
                                                                        that's funny... i see a full TB here. actually a bit more...



                                                                        just because MS thinks they can redefine words doesn't mean they're right.
                                                                        that's a lot of anime. surprised you haven't filled it up already. how's the 1 tera working out for you?
                                                                        Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 | Core i7 Kaby Lake 2.8GHz | 16GB DDR4 RAM | Geforce 1050M | 1TB Samsung 960 EVO
                                                                        Camera: Nikon D750 | 24mm f/1.8G | 35mm f/1.8G | 50mm f/1.8G | 85mm f/1.8G


                                                                        My life is dope and I do dope sht.

                                                                        Comment


                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by Ryoko View Post
                                                                          that's funny... i see a full TB here. actually a bit more...



                                                                          just because MS thinks they can redefine words doesn't mean they're right.

                                                                          731GB of anime?

                                                                          Not so much an issue of MS redefining words, computers don't use the standard SI prefixes, so MS's definition of Gigabyte is actually correct, resulting in 931 proper GB on what, if sold under the same naming system, would be a 1024GB drive. It's the storage industry which decided to redefine words to make their drives seem bigger, and for years, it's just the way it has been.


                                                                          The problem with complaining about it.... is that this fact is fairly well known and that you're technically not getting less than a terabyte..... you're just getting a different measure of terabyte than you expected.
                                                                          Desktop: Intel Core i7 7770k : 16GB EVGA DDR4 2400 : Gigabyte GTX 1070 Ti Windforce X2 : Gigabyte GA-H270-WIFI : AudioQuest DragonFly DAC : Samsung SM961 NVMe 1TB SSD : Corsair Builder 500W PSU : Samsung 1440p 32" Monitor : Klipsch Promedia 2.1 : Windows 10 Pro x64
                                                                          Tablet: Microsoft Surface Pro 4 : Intel Core i5-6300U : 8GB DDR3 : Intel 520 Integrated : 256GB SSD : 12.3" 2736x1824 display : Windows 10 Pro x64
                                                                          HTPC: Intel Core i3 3225 : HD 4000 integrated : 8GB Samsung DDR3 1600 : Gigabyte H77N-Wifi : 120GB Sandisk Extreme SSD : 80W power brick and picoPSU150 XT : Integrated HD Audio : Scepter 32" LCD TV : Logitech Z313 2.1 : Windows 7 Pro x64


                                                                          Comment


                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by Razeus View Post
                                                                            not as big as magicknights.
                                                                            Hey!
                                                                            You sir, have insulted my honor! I challenge you to a duel! <glove slap>
                                                                            No one ever believes me when I say there is absolutely no porn on my computer because I've got less hard drive space on my computer (SCSI=speed, not quantity) than most people have in their MP3 players.

                                                                            Comment


                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by magicknight0233 View Post
                                                                              Hey!
                                                                              You sir, have insulted my honor! I challenge you to a duel! <glove slap>
                                                                              No one ever believes me when I say there is absolutely no porn on my computer because I've got less hard drive space on my computer (SCSI=speed, not quantity) than most people have in their MP3 players.
                                                                              where the hell do you store all your wonderful pics?
                                                                              Laptop: Dell XPS 15 9560 | Core i7 Kaby Lake 2.8GHz | 16GB DDR4 RAM | Geforce 1050M | 1TB Samsung 960 EVO
                                                                              Camera: Nikon D750 | 24mm f/1.8G | 35mm f/1.8G | 50mm f/1.8G | 85mm f/1.8G


                                                                              My life is dope and I do dope sht.

                                                                              Comment


                                                                                #40
                                                                                I see therein lies the confusion that everyone has. SI prefixes are UNAMBIGUOUSLY defined to be powers of 10. Its use in computer circles for powers of 2 is more of a de facto convention than a ratified standard; binary prefixes on the other hand are a ratified standard. You can use SI prefixes for powers of 2 (not recommended), but only if clearly defined as such; JEDEC advises its members to follow the de facto convention because of marketing reasons, so all JEDEC members (memory manufacturers for the most part), use SI prefixes for powers of 2. But for any other purpose, it means powers of 10 unless specified.
                                                                                Last edited by seeker010; Feb 20, 2008, 10:50 AM.
                                                                                Abort, Retry, Fail?

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                Working...
                                                                                X