Announcement

Collapse

Attention! Please read before posting news!

We at Rage3D require that news posts be formatted in a particular way, so before you begin contributing to the front page, we ask that you study the Rage3D News Formatting Guide first.

Thanks for reading!
See more
See less

Club 3D active adapters convert DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Club 3D active adapters convert DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0

    Good news for you R9 Fury X owners and others as Club 3D has finally released an active adapter going from DP 1.2 to HDMI 2.0 for some 4K @ 60Hz resolution goodness! The Tech Report has the scoop and the details.


    The Radeon R9 Fury X shipped without HDMI 2.0 support, so AMD's top-end card couldn't drive many 4K TVs and monitors at 60Hz with an HDMI cable. Fortunately, that shortcoming can be corrected with an active adapter that converts a DisplayPort 1.2 port to HDMI 2.0. Club 3D has announced a pair of these handy adapters, one for mini DisplayPorts and one for standard-sized versions.





    Source: The Tech Report
    Last edited by bittermann; Nov 25, 2015, 01:15 PM.
    [This Space For Rent]

    #2
    I would be more interested in HDMI 2.0a. 2.0 is like an interim standard, 2.0a will allow protected content, 10 bit, 12 bit HDR and more importantly Chroma Subsampling of 4,4,4 vice IQ degrading 4,2,0 of HDMI 2.0.



    HDMI 2.0 basically allows degraded image quality at 60fps on 4096x2160 UHDTVS.

    About Chroma Subsampling:
    Last edited by noko; Nov 25, 2015, 04:46 PM.
    Ryzen 1700x 3.9ghz, Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro, Asus CrossHair 6 Hero 9, 16gb DDR4 3200 @ 3466, EVGA 1080 Ti, 950w PC pwr & cooling PS, 1TB NVMe Intel SSD M2 Drive + 256mb Mushkin SSD + 512gb Samsung 850evo M.2 in enclosure for Sata III and 2x 1tb WD SATA III, 34" Dell " U3415W IPS + 27" IPS YHAMAKASI Catleap. Win10 Pro

    Custom SFF built case, I7 6700k OC 4.4ghz, PowerColor R9 Nano,, 1TB NVMe Intel SSD M2 Drive, 16gb DDR 4 3000 Corsair LPX, LG 27" 4K IPS FreeSync 10bit monitor, Win 10

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by noko View Post
      I would be more interested in HDMI 2.0a. 2.0 is like an interim standard, 2.0a will allow protected content, 10 bit, 12 bit HDR and more importantly Chroma Subsampling of 4,4,4 vice IQ degrading 4,2,0 of HDMI 2.0.



      HDMI 2.0 basically allows degraded image quality at 60fps on 4096x2160 UHDTVS.

      About Chroma Subsampling:
      http://www.5dfilmmaking.com/tut_444.htm
      Lots of misinformation here. Is it because Fury X doesn't have native HDMI 2.0 support?

      All Blu Rays (highest quality of any source) ship with Chroma 4:2:0 Chroma subsampling, so nothing is "degraded" over the HDMI 2.0 spec itself.

      HDCP 2.2 also specifies 4K/60 with a 4:4:4 color space, and that is part of the HDMI 2.0 spec. However, you won't see native 4:4:4 content even in UHD, because the chips do a fine job of decompressing 4:2:0 content without degradation of color loss. HDMI 2.0 specifies 18 GB/s bandwidth and that is more than enough for even 7k content.



      Comment


        #4
        Confusion

        Originally posted by Exposed View Post
        Lots of misinformation here. Is it because Fury X doesn't have native HDMI 2.0 support?

        All Blu Rays (highest quality of any source) ship with Chroma 4:2:0 Chroma subsampling, so nothing is "degraded" over the HDMI 2.0 spec itself.

        HDCP 2.2 also specifies 4K/60 with a 4:4:4 color space, and that is part of the HDMI 2.0 spec. However, you won't see native 4:4:4 content even in UHD, because the chips do a fine job of decompressing 4:2:0 content without degradation of color loss. HDMI 2.0 specifies 18 GB/s bandwidth and that is more than enough for even 7k content.



        http://hometheaterreview.com/what-yo...about-hdmi-20/
        Maybe, plus some confusion as well. Info was from AnAndTech:


        4:2:0 is a color compressed video signal that does indeed cause degradation. Looks like HDMI 2.0 can support 4:4:4 as an option.

        HDMI 2.0a extends color to 10 bit, 12 bit and HDR - anyways read the AnAndTech article maybe that will be clearer then my confusion aspect of what is going to happen. I just can't see new UHD Blu-Ray players not supporting all those HDMI 2.0 UHDTV's that has been sold in the last several years.
        Ryzen 1700x 3.9ghz, Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro, Asus CrossHair 6 Hero 9, 16gb DDR4 3200 @ 3466, EVGA 1080 Ti, 950w PC pwr & cooling PS, 1TB NVMe Intel SSD M2 Drive + 256mb Mushkin SSD + 512gb Samsung 850evo M.2 in enclosure for Sata III and 2x 1tb WD SATA III, 34" Dell " U3415W IPS + 27" IPS YHAMAKASI Catleap. Win10 Pro

        Custom SFF built case, I7 6700k OC 4.4ghz, PowerColor R9 Nano,, 1TB NVMe Intel SSD M2 Drive, 16gb DDR 4 3000 Corsair LPX, LG 27" 4K IPS FreeSync 10bit monitor, Win 10

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by noko View Post
          Maybe, plus some confusion as well. Info was from AnAndTech:


          4:2:0 is a color compressed video signal that does indeed cause degradation. Looks like HDMI 2.0 can support 4:4:4 as an option.

          HDMI 2.0a extends color to 10 bit, 12 bit and HDR - anyways read the AnAndTech article maybe that will be clearer then my confusion aspect of what is going to happen. I just can't see new UHD Blu-Ray players not supporting all those HDMI 2.0 UHDTV's that has been sold in the last several years.
          It's 4:2:0 on the media source but it's decompressed on the output source to 4:4:4 as long as the output source is HDMI 2.0 compliant and the TV has the appropriate HDMI port for it. It'll look something like this:

          HDMI 1 (HDCP, ARC) 4:2:0
          HDMI 2 (HDCP) 4:2:0
          HDMI 3 (HDCP with 3.5mm audio in) 4:4:4 at 60Hz
          HDMI 4 (HDCP 2.2, MHL) 4:2:0

          HDMI 2.0a is too new and no content exists for it yet, and even the next generation UHD Blu Rays will still retain 4:2:0 compression. The goal is for 4k 60fps which eats up bandwidth and space, and the first thing to go to save space almost always the extra color detail that most people can't see anways because most TV's haven't caught up to that kind of color accuracy.
          Last edited by Exposed; Dec 2, 2015, 06:54 AM.

          Comment


            #6
            The adapters seem to be feature complete.



            Comment


              #7
              Now if I could only find where to buy one

              Comment

              Working...
              X