Attention! Please read before posting news!

We at Rage3D require that news posts be formatted in a particular way, so before you begin contributing to the front page, we ask that you study the Rage3D News Formatting Guide first.

Thanks for reading!
See more
See less

AMD Radeon Fury X PCI-Express Scaling

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    AMD Radeon Fury X PCI-Express Scaling

    If you're a fan of the new AMD Radeon Fury X you may be interested in an article Techpowerup has written about PCIE scaling with the new card. Hit the link to see what the results were and how well it scales.

    It's been one year since our last PCI-Express scaling article in which we used GeForce GTX 980s. Not much has happened since then in terms of slot technology and bandwidth. Just like in recent years, almost everybody is using PCI-Express x16 3.0, and while Intel's Enthusiast Platform (Haswell-E) has plenty of lanes for even multiple VGA cards, it's the exception as every other motherboard still splits the x16 3.0 slot into two x8 3.0 slots for a dual-GPU setup.

    PCI-Express 3.0 saw its debut on Intel's Sandy Bridge-E processors, but was adopted into the mainstream when the Ivy Bridge architecture was released in 2012. Since then, PCI-E 3.0 has been used on Haswell and now Skylake.

    While PCI-Express 1.0 pushes 250 MB/s per direction, PCI-Express 2.0 pushes 500 MB/s, and PCI-Express 3.0 doubles that to 1 GB/s. The resulting absolute bandwidth of PCI-Express 3.0 x16, 32 GB/s, might seem like overkill, but the ability to transfer that much data per lane could come to the rescue of 8-lanes (x8) and 4-lanes (x4) configurations.

    In this review, we test the impact of running AMD's Radeon Fury X on our new Windows 10 test bench using electrical Intel Skylake PCI-Express x16, x8, and x4 slots. We made a point of testing all three generations of the PCI-Express interface: 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0.

    Source: techpowerup
    [This Space For Rent]