**Official 3DMARK'06 Thread!** - Page 2

3_Stooges_Nuke · Jan 18, 2006, 06:43 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098

7372, nothing overclocked. not bad.

3_Stooges_Nuke · Jan 18, 2006, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TiTaN

7529...not bad

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6649

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098

I'm close. I'm suprised your CPU score was so low. your video scores really seemed to spank my crashfire though.

OverclockN' · Jan 18, 2006, 06:52 PM

4292

Didn't do any changes, but just ran it again so I could get a link.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8194

apollooff320 · Jan 18, 2006, 07:40 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8962

BroadbandGamer · Jan 18, 2006, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vogon

Yeah Nvidia gave futuremark a bung

Seriously, there is no reason for there to be such a difference ... I have had 7800gtx and x1800xt and in gaming theres not much in it speedwise, of course better drivers on ATi

Wonder if you do the test with 4xAA on HDR, then ATi should, by rights, score better 'cos nvidia cant do that ?

downloading now to see what its all about anyhoo ...

Vogon,

Since you have a X1800 XT and 7800 GTX. Which one do you prefer? I just got my kids X1800 XT and I'm thinking about giving him my 7800 GTX and taking the X1800 XT. What do you think?

TiTaN · Jan 18, 2006, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3_Stooges_Nuke

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098

I'm close. I'm suprised your CPU score was so low. your video scores really seemed to spank my crashfire though.

Well, since this is brand new I'd say the dual-cores will really shine, even ahead of the almight FX-57...which is why an FX-60 is in my near future

Evileh · Jan 18, 2006, 08:42 PM

Holy Sh1t!!!!!! 962... I haven't seen that since my old computer ran 3dmarks 04... omfg.... And that's when I got a new one...

busboy · Jan 18, 2006, 09:26 PM

well my laptop got a 394 (2.13 M 1GB ram and a fire GL 3200) I havent ran my home system yet but i will post the results cause this sucks hehe. On a brighter note i dont plan on playing 3dmark

HisSvt2 · Jan 18, 2006, 09:31 PM

fresh install and Cat 6.1 new crossfire X1600XT setup http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10519

greasyhands · Jan 18, 2006, 09:34 PM

3970
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10551
(my rig) quality

4041
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10797
(my rig) high performance

Ravenhaft · Jan 18, 2006, 10:04 PM

5.13 Drivers Score = 4595
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10758

This is running the overclocks I normally run my system at. Overclocking didn't raise my score much, just from like 4100 to almost 4600. Or maybe that is pretty significant, I guess that's what, a 10% increase? I hear that the R520 series doesn't score as well as it should, as 3dmark06 doesn't make good use of flow control, and the shader 2.0 stuff is biased towards nvidia. That's all from Techreport, I have no idea, we'll have to see and I'm excited about R580.

LOL HisSVt2 I was freaking out for a second, wondering how you got scores on par with mine with x1600 XT, then realized you were running in Crossfire, lol

ShaidarHaran · Jan 18, 2006, 10:16 PM

I'm taking these initial scores with a grain of salt, to say the least. Until it is known precisely why NV cards score so much higher than comparable ATI cards, I'd say something smells a wee bit fishy here. Could just be a lack of optimizations on ATI's part, but I'm leaning more towards this benchmark being written specifically NV hardware in mind.

Edit: for the sake of clarity, I'm not saying this is a bad benchmark (yet) because it produces higher scores on NV hardware, but because it produces significantly higher scores across the entire range of NV hardware. When you've got a benchmark that says a 6600GT is significantly faster than an X800 GTO, something is wrong with said benchmark. Let alone when said benchmark produces a higher SM 2.0 score for the 6600GT than the X800 GTO. That's just plain silly. There is absolutely no evidence of the 6600GT being faster @ SM2.0 than the X800 GTO in the real world, so why does this benchmark produce this result?

CrazyOtter · Jan 18, 2006, 10:34 PM

The X1800XT is running at 690/800.
I think the results are getting too distorted by dual cpu scores to be a very good benchmark. These results don't translate to real world gaming score at all anymore. With any current games, and probably for quite a bit of this year the faster single core performs better than any dual core CPU.

Also, this version will seemingly only run smooth if you spend more than 800 Euro on a single video card.
This benchmark gets uninstalled until I upgrade to R600/G80....when it probably should have been released.
Slideshows hurt my eyes.

SSXeon · Jan 18, 2006, 11:12 PM

4041 meh:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11678

SSXeon

DooMeous · Jan 18, 2006, 11:32 PM

Crossfired X1800s with Opteron [email protected]

7800ish

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11842

friskyolive · Jan 18, 2006, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bratboy

Well have an x800xtpe. Got a whoopin 2015 hehe. Will try and run a real clean run later

That was the exact same score I got! Sad, isn't it, heheh.

SSXeon · Jan 18, 2006, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DooMeous

Crossfired X1800s with Opteron [email protected]

7800ish

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11842

HOLY SH!T!!

SSXeon

Mike EFix · Jan 18, 2006, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian48

Here's MINE!!

Dell 9100
P4 3.0ghz, HT
128mb X300SE (on-board PCI-E x16)
512mb DDR2 (2x256mb)

Yes, I'm at the office right now

Gottcha beat!!

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12097

Brian48 · Jan 19, 2006, 12:05 AM

OK, finally got around to running it on my home machines. Normally the CPUs are overclocked, but for these tests, I kept everything at factory default

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9550
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8592

Pretty intense benchmark.

Supra_Freak · Jan 19, 2006, 12:35 AM

I finally got around to running it on my home machine as well...

6800GT Stock 350/1000 = 2374
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=12140

GPU Overclock 400/1120 = 2502
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12348

Pretty crazy benchmark id say, im surprised i did so well.... if you can even call that good?!?!?!

CactusClown · Jan 19, 2006, 02:19 AM

My scores:

Pretty insane score, isn't it?

(Using Catalyst 5.11. Won't install newer for a benchmark. Everything else works fine.)

Only the demo runs. Draws 3-5 frames, then waits seconds, then 3-5 frames again, etc...

Vogon · Jan 19, 2006, 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadbandGamer

Vogon,

Since you have a X1800 XT and 7800 GTX. Which one do you prefer? I just got my kids X1800 XT and I'm thinking about giving him my 7800 GTX and taking the X1800 XT. What do you think?

Speedwise for 95% of games nothing in it, the other 5% is a case of swings and roundabouts.
I prefer the X1800 'cos I feel ATi has better drivers, and nicer IQ.
When I had the GTX(s) there was always something that wouldn't work quite as it should.
Also the drivers from ATi are updated regulary so you know if there is a problem a fix shouldn't be far away, nvidia tend to be irregular and dont listen too any problems ... one game I had problems with has never been fixed since the release of the 7800gtx ... well it was ... by the devs as they got fed up waiting for nvidia to sort it .. it always ran flawless on ATi.

So yes I much prefer the X1800

@ ShaidarHaran, 100% in agreement with your views on Nvidia scoring higher across the board... except even if the scores were close were they should be, I still think its not a particulary good indication of game performance ... Hell, a card from 2 generations ago wouldn't run that slowly in modern games ...

wunderbar · Jan 19, 2006, 05:08 AM

2801 for my socket A / 6800 GT rig, not bad

Doozer · Jan 19, 2006, 06:36 AM

No scores yet ? Guess 3DMark06 kills pc's

I will test mine when I get home tonight

Fates Warning · Jan 19, 2006, 08:08 AM

I ran it just once and here's what I got:

3DMark Score: 1667
SM2.0 Score: 909
CPU Score: 592

It's a slide show on the CPU tests.

Brian48 · Jan 19, 2006, 08:53 AM

Yeah, for the first time in nearly two years, my CPU actually feels like the bottleneck. That's a weird feeling

ewitte · Jan 19, 2006, 09:17 AM

5213 single X1800XT 778/873
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=16562

TiTaN · Jan 19, 2006, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DooMeous

Crossfired X1800s with Opteron [email protected]

7800ish

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11842

Right under you...just need my FX-60

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=19134

Edit: If you'll notice, my SLI kicks your crossfires ass

VW_Factor · Jan 19, 2006, 09:58 AM

I got around to doing a clean run this morning without too much going on in the background.

Not shabby.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=19006

Strangely enough, my reported core clock is the low power. *scraches head* oh well.

ziimen · Jan 19, 2006, 10:26 AM

Hey supra-freak, I got the same card clocked 415/1150. These are the scores:

3DMark Score 2763 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1163 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 1063 Marks
CPU Score 1063 Marks

I was doing 2584 with 81.95 drivers. Try 81.98, they're "certified" by futuremark anyway.

Jan 18, 2006, 06:43 PM	#31	Advertisement (Guests Only) Login or Register to remove this ad
3_Stooges_Nuke Curly+Moe+Shemp=Hero's Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 1,204	http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098 7372, nothing overclocked. not bad. __________________ ASUS P5E Intel XQ6850 Quad Core (3.4Ghz) Visiontek HD 4870 PC Power and Cooling 1000 WATT PS EXOS Water Cooling for CPU and NorthBridge 4 GIG Mushkin DDR2 RAM 4x WD WD4000YR 400gig SATA HD's. 2x Samsung DVD Burners. Windows XP SP2

Jan 18, 2006, 06:52 PM	#33
OverclockN' Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Iowa Posts: 22,937	4292 Didn't do any changes, but just ran it again so I could get a link. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8194 __________________ In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity...Albert Einstein -------------------------------------------------------

OverclockN''s System Specs
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AorusMaster
CPU	i9 9900KF
Graphics	Asus ROG 1080Ti Strix
Memory	32GB G.Skill DDR4 3200
Cooling Solution	Corsair H100i
Display	Sony Bravia X900F 49" / HP ZR24W 24"
Soundcard & Speakers	Denon AVR-X2400/5.1 Elac B5.2, C5.2, SUB3010
Hard-Drives	500GB Samsung 840 SSD / WD 3TB Green
Power Supply	Corsair HX1000W
Case	Corsair 600T Silver Edition
Input Devices	Corsair Nightsword Mouse / G15 Keyboard / G25 Racing Wheel / Xbox 1 Gamepad
Operating System	Windows 10

Jan 18, 2006, 07:40 PM	#34
apollooff320 Radeon R520 Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Ohio Posts: 354	http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8962 __________________ AMD X2 [email protected] 300Gb Harddrive MSI 7800GT 450/1200 2GB OCZ EL Platinum DDR400 19'' Benq FP91G+ Logitech Z-5500

TiTaN's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus P5W-DH Deluxe (1101)
CPU	Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
Graphics	eVGA 7950GX2
Memory	2GB Corsair TWIN2X2048-6400C4
Display	HP A7217A (FW900)
Soundcard & Speakers	Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty & Logitech Z5500 5.1
Hard-Drives	2x 150GB WD Raptors in RAID 0
Power Supply	PC P&C 510 SLI
Case	Antec P180
Input Devices	Logitech G15, Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 3.0, Belkin Nostromo n52
Operating System	Windows XP Home Edition

Jan 18, 2006, 08:42 PM	#37
Evileh Keep your pimp hip strong Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Springfield, Illinois Posts: 9,167	Holy Sh1t!!!!!! 962... I haven't seen that since my old computer ran 3dmarks 04... omfg.... And that's when I got a new one... __________________ Battlefield 2 Stats Battlefield 2142 Stats Battlefield Bad Company 2 Stats Battlefield 3 Stats Xfire evilgenius84 Xbox Live Gamer's Tag: Evileh Sittal on BF2142 "wtf. seriously. this has got to be the worst game i have EVER played. far worse than left behind."

Evileh's System Specs
Motherboard	Gigb Aorus Ultra Gaming 7
CPU	Ryzen 2700x
Graphics	Asus 2080 Duel OC 8GB
Memory	16 GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB @3200 Mhz
Cooling Solution	NZXT Kraken x62
Display	Acer XF270HUA 144Hz 1440p
Soundcard & Speakers	Logitech G933 Spectrum Wireless
Hard-Drives	Samsung Evo 840
Power Supply	EVGA SuperNOVA G2 Gold 1000 watt
Case	Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
Input Devices	Logitech G503 Proteus Spectrum RGB, Corsiar K95 Plat
Operating System	Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64bit

Jan 18, 2006, 09:26 PM	#38
busboy I'm the wallet inspector Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario Posts: 871	well my laptop got a 394 (2.13 M 1GB ram and a fire GL 3200) I havent ran my home system yet but i will post the results cause this sucks hehe. On a brighter note i dont plan on playing 3dmark

busboy's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus
CPU	i750 @3.6
Graphics	Saphire 5850
Memory	G Skill ddr 3 1600
Display	Benq 24 inch
Operating System	WIN 7 64bit

Jan 18, 2006, 09:31 PM	#39
HisSvt2 Radeon R420 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 201	fresh install and Cat 6.1 new crossfire X1600XT setup http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10519 __________________ Gateway 6831-FX Laptop Vista X64 Intel Core 2 duo T8300 4Gb [email protected] 2X250GB raid 0 8800M GTS 512MB DS/Xbox/Dreamcast/N64/Gamecube/XBOX 360/PS3/Wii

Jan 18, 2006, 09:34 PM	#40
greasyhands Vega 64 Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Minnesota Posts: 852	3970 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10551 (my rig) quality 4041 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10797 (my rig) high performance Last edited by greasyhands : Jan 18, 2006 at 09:53 PM.

greasyhands's System Specs
Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi
CPU	AMD 2700X
Graphics	Sapphire Vega 64
Memory	16GB GSkill FlareX 3200
Cooling Solution	Wraith Prism
Display	Acer XG27OHU 27" 2560x1440 144hz
Soundcard & Speakers	Realtek 1220
Hard-Drives	500 GB M.2 Evo 970 ,1TB Mushkin Reactor SSD
Optical Drives	none
Power Supply	EVGA 850GQ
Case	Fractal R5
Input Devices	Rosewill RK-9100xbbl Mechanical keyboard
Operating System	Windows 10
Extra Info	built in wife repellant

Jan 18, 2006, 10:04 PM	#41
Ravenhaft Newbie Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 9	5.13 Drivers Score = 4595 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10758 This is running the overclocks I normally run my system at. Overclocking didn't raise my score much, just from like 4100 to almost 4600. Or maybe that is pretty significant, I guess that's what, a 10% increase? I hear that the R520 series doesn't score as well as it should, as 3dmark06 doesn't make good use of flow control, and the shader 2.0 stuff is biased towards nvidia. That's all from Techreport, I have no idea, we'll have to see and I'm excited about R580. LOL HisSVt2 I was freaking out for a second, wondering how you got scores on par with mine with x1600 XT, then realized you were running in Crossfire, lol Last edited by Ravenhaft : Jan 18, 2006 at 10:10 PM.

Jan 18, 2006, 10:16 PM	#42
ShaidarHaran Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: twin cities Posts: 24,941	I'm taking these initial scores with a grain of salt, to say the least. Until it is known precisely why NV cards score so much higher than comparable ATI cards, I'd say something smells a wee bit fishy here. Could just be a lack of optimizations on ATI's part, but I'm leaning more towards this benchmark being written specifically NV hardware in mind. Edit: for the sake of clarity, I'm not saying this is a bad benchmark (yet) because it produces higher scores on NV hardware, but because it produces significantly higher scores across the entire range of NV hardware. When you've got a benchmark that says a 6600GT is significantly faster than an X800 GTO, something is wrong with said benchmark. Let alone when said benchmark produces a higher SM 2.0 score for the 6600GT than the X800 GTO. That's just plain silly. There is absolutely no evidence of the 6600GT being faster @ SM2.0 than the X800 GTO in the real world, so why does this benchmark produce this result? Last edited by ShaidarHaran : Jan 18, 2006 at 10:25 PM.

ShaidarHaran's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus Strix Z270h
CPU	i7 7700k @ 5.2GHz (1.39V) 24x7
Graphics	GTX 1070
Memory	16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600 18-19-19-39-2T
Cooling Solution	dual radiator custom water cooling loop
Display	48" 4k + 27" 1440p 144hz
Hard-Drives	OCZ Vertex 4 512GB boot drive, Seagate Barracuda 7200 3TB
Power Supply	Corsair RM750
Case	Fractal Design Define S
Input Devices	Razer Death Adder + Razer Black Widow
Operating System	Win 10 Pro

Jan 18, 2006, 10:34 PM	#43
CrazyOtter 4870X2 Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ireland Posts: 70	The X1800XT is running at 690/800. I think the results are getting too distorted by dual cpu scores to be a very good benchmark. These results don't translate to real world gaming score at all anymore. With any current games, and probably for quite a bit of this year the faster single core performs better than any dual core CPU. Also, this version will seemingly only run smooth if you spend more than 800 Euro on a single video card. This benchmark gets uninstalled until I upgrade to R600/G80....when it probably should have been released. Slideshows hurt my eyes.

Jan 18, 2006, 11:12 PM	#44
SSXeon CAPS CAPS CAPS Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Virginia Posts: 10,780	4041 meh: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11678 SSXeon __________________

Jan 18, 2006, 11:32 PM	#45
DooMeous Radeon R200 Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 81	Crossfired X1800s with Opteron [email protected] 7800ish http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11842

DooMeous's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus Maximum Extreme
CPU	E8600 @4.6ghz
Graphics	4870X2
Memory	8 gigs corsair
Cooling Solution	liquid cooled CPU + motherboard
Display	Benq 24inch lcd
Soundcard & Speakers	Creative Xifi
Hard-Drives	200gig seagate + (2)36gig raptor
Optical Drives	Lite on DVDRW + Blu-ray
Power Supply	1000Watt ocz
Case	Kandalf liquid cooling case
Input Devices	logitech
Operating System	Vista 64 home premium

Jan 19, 2006, 12:05 AM	#49
Brian48 Rage3D Veteran Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 1,215	OK, finally got around to running it on my home machines. Normally the CPUs are overclocked, but for these tests, I kept everything at factory default http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9550 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8592 Pretty intense benchmark. __________________ Heatware references eBay references

Jan 19, 2006, 12:35 AM	#50
Supra_Freak I did this to your momma! Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Delhi Ontario, Canada Posts: 7,012	I finally got around to running it on my home machine as well... 6800GT Stock 350/1000 = 2374 http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=12140 GPU Overclock 400/1120 = 2502 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12348 Pretty crazy benchmark id say, im surprised i did so well.... if you can even call that good?!?!?! __________________ Last edited by Supra_Freak : Jan 19, 2006 at 07:48 PM.

Supra_Freak's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus P5NSli
CPU	Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.40GHz
Graphics	EVGA e-GeForce 8800GTX @ 620/2000
Memory	4GB DDR2
Display	Samsung 940BW 19" Widescreen LCD
Soundcard & Speakers	Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS \| Logitech Z-680's - 5.1
Hard-Drives	1TB Western Digital Black
Optical Drives	LG CD/RW 52X, LG DVD/RW Dual Layer
Power Supply	Thermaltake Toughpower 650W
Case	Antec 900
Input Devices	Logitech Elite Keyboard, Logitech MX510 Blue Mouse
Operating System	Windows 7 Home Premium

Jan 19, 2006, 02:19 AM	#51
CactusClown #endif Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Hungary Posts: 683	My scores: Pretty insane score, isn't it? (Using Catalyst 5.11. Won't install newer for a benchmark. Everything else works fine.) Only the demo runs. Draws 3-5 frames, then waits seconds, then 3-5 frames again, etc... __________________ Athlon 64 3200+ (@2400) \| AC Freezer 64 \| Asus A8N-SLI SE \| Zalman ZM-NBF47 \| 2*512 MB DDR400 Hynix+Samsung (dual channel, 2.5-3-3-8, 1T) \| Inno3D GeForce 7600 GST 256MB\| Primecooler VGAHG1 Cu \| LG F700B \| PSU: 450W Chieftec \| Audigy1 \| 80G Maxtor \| 160G Seagate \| NEC 2510A S3 Virge -> Voodoo1 -> TNT2 -> GF2 MX400 -> GF3 Ti200 -> 9600XT -> [email protected] -> GF4 MX420 -> GF 7600 GST

CactusClown's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus A8N-SLI SE
CPU	AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Graphics	Inno3D GeForce 7600 GST 256MB
Memory	1 GB (Hynix, Samsung)
Cooling Solution	AC Freezer 64, VGAHG1 Cu, ZM-NBF47
Display	LG F700B
Soundcard & Speakers	Creative Audigy
Hard-Drives	Seagate 160GB, Maxtor 80GB
Optical Drives	NEC ND-2510A
Power Supply	Chieftec GPS-450AA 450W
Input Devices	Genius Netscroll+ Optical, Genius keyboard
Operating System	Windows XP Pro

Jan 19, 2006, 05:08 AM	#53
wunderbar Rage3D Veteran Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 1,308	2801 for my socket A / 6800 GT rig, not bad

wunderbar's System Specs
Motherboard	DFI ICFX3200 RD600
CPU	INTEL Core 2 Duo E6600
Graphics	ATI Radeon X1900XT
Memory	2GB Corsair XMS6400
Cooling Solution	Watercooled CPU & NB
Display	LG 19" CRT
Soundcard & Speakers	X-Fi & Logitech Z5500 5.1
Hard-Drives	2x Seagate 7200.10 320GB RAID 0
Optical Drives	NEC 3540 16x DVD-RW
Power Supply	Antec HE 500
Case	Thermaltake Armor
Operating System	Windows XP Pro

Jan 19, 2006, 06:36 AM	#54
Doozer lollollollol Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: SE London, UK Posts: 19,033	No scores yet ? Guess 3DMark06 kills pc's I will test mine when I get home tonight __________________ Rage3d flickr Group

Jan 19, 2006, 08:08 AM	#55
Fates Warning Radeon R300 Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 143	I ran it just once and here's what I got: 3DMark Score: 1667 SM2.0 Score: 909 CPU Score: 592 It's a slide show on the CPU tests.

Fates Warning's System Specs
Motherboard	ASUS P5B
CPU	Intel E6400 @ 3.0 GHz
Graphics	MSI Radeon HD 4850
Memory	4x1GB G.Skill PC6400 @ 4-4-4-12
Display	24" LG L246WP
Soundcard & Speakers	X-Fi XtremeGamer & Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Hard-Drives	2 x Seagate Barracuda 320GB
Optical Drives	NEC 3540A 16x DVD-RW
Power Supply	Seasonic 550w
Case	Antec Sonata II
Input Devices	Logitech MX518
Operating System	Windows Vista Ultimate x64 SP1

Jan 19, 2006, 08:53 AM	#56
Brian48 Rage3D Veteran Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 1,215	Yeah, for the first time in nearly two years, my CPU actually feels like the bottleneck. That's a weird feeling __________________ Heatware references eBay references

Jan 19, 2006, 09:17 AM	#57
ewitte Radeon R100 Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 31	5213 single X1800XT 778/873 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=16562

VW_Factor's System Specs
Motherboard	ABit VH6-II
CPU	PIII - 1GHz
Graphics	Geforce2
Memory	256M PC100
Cooling Solution	Heatsinks
Display	Dell 15" CRT
Soundcard & Speakers	Kinyo
Hard-Drives	20G Maxtor
Optical Drives	CD Burner
Power Supply	300Watt Generic
Case	AT Compatible
Input Devices	Keyboard, Mouse, Microphone
Operating System	Windows ME
Extra Info	FTW!

Jan 19, 2006, 10:26 AM	#60
ziimen Radeon R420 Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 279	Hey supra-freak, I got the same card clocked 415/1150. These are the scores: 3DMark Score 2763 3DMarks SM 2.0 Score 1163 Marks SM 3.0 Score 1063 Marks CPU Score 1063 Marks I was doing 2584 with 81.95 drivers. Try 81.98, they're "certified" by futuremark anyway. __________________ Q9550 @ 4Ghz EVGA 790i-Ultra Mushkin 4GB @ 1900Mhz 8-7-7-18 EVGA GTX 275 @ FTW WD 150GB Velociraptor + 500GB RE3 Samsung 226BW

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode