Go Back   Rage3D » Rage3D Discussion Area » Archived Discussions » Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking
Rage3D Subscribe Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking Discuss Radeon tweaking, modding, and overclocking practices. Want to post your benchmarks scores? This is the place!

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 29, 2007, 06:23 AM   #1
Advertisement (Guests Only)

Login or Register to remove this ad
titomax82
Radeon X1950 Pro AGP
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 48
titomax82 is still being judged by the masses


Default Strange 3DMark'06 results

Looking at the following links I think they're not correct result. Considering the type of hardware and considering they're not overclocked these results seem too much high for a x1950pro.
Are they the result of some trick?
Please give me your opinion, thanx

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=966929

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1001705
__________________
NB: HP G62-B29SL
DT: MyModBigT Thermaltake Toughpower 750W C2Q [email protected],15GHz def Vcore ASUS P5WDG2-WS-PRO GTX 560 TI
WD Raptor X 1500AHFD Audigy+Inspire5.1 SyncMaster-2032BW Patriot Viper DDR2 4GB DC 1066
titomax82 is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2007, 10:25 AM   #2
Hardwood
Radeon Evergreen
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,737
Hardwood is still being judged by the masses


Default

Yup, I noticed that after doing my benchie. Of course the cpu price on the first one is 999.00 bucks I've heard nothing but good about the core-duo cpu. In reality, before my 1950 screwed up I was very happy with it's capability even though it's result was only 1/2 of either of those. 4724ish
__________________
<---Computer #1 in System Specs Button

Computer #2) MSI A88X-G45, AMD A10-7850K, IGP, AMD 2x4GB 2133 Ram (R938G2130U1K), Antec 750w True, 128GB Sandisk SSD, 1TB WD Black, Win 10pro x64
Computer#3) GA-MA790FX, AMD 955, Thermaltake 550w, ASUS HD5870, Win10pro x86
Hardwood is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2007, 12:33 PM   #3
titomax82
Radeon X1950 Pro AGP
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 48
titomax82 is still being judged by the masses


Default

That cpu is only slightly faster than mine. I have overclocked mine to that frequencies and the cpu score matches. The 2 gpu type of scores are very strange. I think they're not real.
__________________
NB: HP G62-B29SL
DT: MyModBigT Thermaltake Toughpower 750W C2Q [email protected],15GHz def Vcore ASUS P5WDG2-WS-PRO GTX 560 TI
WD Raptor X 1500AHFD Audigy+Inspire5.1 SyncMaster-2032BW Patriot Viper DDR2 4GB DC 1066
titomax82 is offline  
Advertisement (Guests Only)
Login or Register to remove this ad
Old Jan 29, 2007, 02:11 PM   #4
Mcmlxxx IV
Radeon R420
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States Southern California
Posts: 244
Mcmlxxx IV is still being judged by the masses


Default

Those GPU scores are WAY higher than my x1950xt. Since it looks like the x1950pro is stock clocked, I would have to say something fishy is going on there. Those scores look to me to be around 8800gts level or maybe a little lower.
__________________
Core i7 4790K
Gigabyte GA-Z97x-UD7
16 GB Crucial DDR3-1866
MSI GTX 1080TI
Logitech z5500 5.1
512 GB Crucial M550 SSD, 4TB WD Black Series, Samsung 850 Pro 1TB for games
Corsair HX850
Thermaltake Core V51 Case
Mcmlxxx IV is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2007, 03:20 PM   #5
becco
Radeon Evergreen
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: in its right place
Posts: 1,990
becco is still being judged by the masses


Default

waoo!!! that was to high man
But, look at the CPU score? it's only 2373. I think that X1950Pro run in Cross Fire, cmiiw man.
__________________
“The person you love can only go as far as you let them in" - Billy Corgan

My YouTube
becco is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2007, 04:15 AM   #6
Sunfox
Radeon R200
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 89
Sunfox is still being judged by the masses


Default

Yes, those two specific benchmarks are indeed in crossfire mode. Look for "Co-operative adapters: yes", which is the only place the ORB mentions this rather crucial piece of information.
Sunfox is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2007, 04:26 AM   #7
titomax82
Radeon X1950 Pro AGP
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 48
titomax82 is still being judged by the masses


Default

Now I understand! It's all clear...
even if:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1096548

I think futuremark should control more their published result!
__________________
NB: HP G62-B29SL
DT: MyModBigT Thermaltake Toughpower 750W C2Q [email protected],15GHz def Vcore ASUS P5WDG2-WS-PRO GTX 560 TI
WD Raptor X 1500AHFD Audigy+Inspire5.1 SyncMaster-2032BW Patriot Viper DDR2 4GB DC 1066
titomax82 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2007, 05:42 AM   #8
Sunfox
Radeon R200
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 89
Sunfox is still being judged by the masses


Default

Now *that* result, based on the provided information, is just plain wrong.
Sunfox is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange O/C results...? Riptide Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking 1 Mar 31, 2004 07:24 PM
Strange 3DMark results.. Chuck Off Topic Lounge 6 Apr 12, 2003 04:54 AM
Strange Overclocking Results with P4 1.7 Ghz No_Style General Hardware 6 Nov 21, 2002 04:13 PM
Strange results with rage3d oveclocking! hutz Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking 2 Jun 18, 2002 09:32 AM
3D Mark 2001: Strange results! DaWizeGuy AMD Radeon Discussion and Support 0 Mar 24, 2001 02:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Copyright ©1998-2011 Rage3D.com
Links monetized by VigLink