![]() |
|
AMD Radeon Discussion and Support General discussion, tweaking, overclocking and technical support questions about discrete Radeon graphics products. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,221
![]() ![]() |
![]() Oh my!!!!! That thing should be a beast... Just what I was asking for! (not 3+ cards) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Radeon R700
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 863
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,221
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
![]()
Posts: 14,533
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Radeon R700
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
![]()
Posts: 878
![]() ![]() |
![]() no one noticed that there's only one bridge connector ? hummm..
__________________
-Burn see button on the left for system specs. There's a fine line between fishing and just standing on the shore like an idiot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Radeon Northern Islands
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,162
![]() ![]() |
![]() So this'll be my next purchase...or 4x3870s. Bahh, release it already, I need to buy some useless expensive stuff again, haven't done that in months...which makes me think about Phenom ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
CAPS CAPS CAPS
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
![]()
Posts: 10,889
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Radeon R300
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 158
![]() ![]() |
![]() Wow is that going to be the actual size of the cards? I do hope they shrink it down more on the final product! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
HD3850 AGP 512MB
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
![]()
Posts: 3,581
![]() ![]() |
You go try to shrink a 55mm dual gpu pcb with current fab process... good luck Hmm HD 3870x2 in Crossfire its nice IF AMD EVER FIXES CROSSFIRE properly =/
__________________
Got AMD? Last edited by DnL : Nov 16, 2007 at 12:39 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
CAPS CAPS CAPS
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
![]()
Posts: 10,889
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
deal with it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,622
![]() ![]() |
![]() rumor has it that this might see a December release date. Only time will tell if this is true or not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
space cadet
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
![]()
Posts: 27,322
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() im gonna get rid of my 2 2900XT's and replace them with these bad boys ![]() 3870x2 CF ftw!
__________________
____________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
CAPS CAPS CAPS
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
![]()
Posts: 10,889
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,221
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
I like my backyard
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location:
![]()
Posts: 9,159
![]() ![]() |
![]() What's the price for the x2 expected to be?
__________________
I got a pair of tweezers, a can of air, and some bacardi :\ - sittal |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,221
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Radeon R700
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV-426
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() |
![]() lol so if you get two of those in Crossfire you'll be sitting on 1280 stream processors! ![]()
__________________
Gigabyte P35C DS3R, E6750, Leadtek Winfast PX8800 GTS 512MB, 3GB Kingston DDR2 800, Seagate 250GB ST3250820AS, Samsung 160GB SV160N, Terratec DMX 6fire 24/96, Silverstone ST60F 600W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Bohemia Interactive
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location:
![]()
Posts: 3,481
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() erm ![]() so i guess 3-4x X2 is not gunna happen w/o at least one board with two CFX connectors still it's just detail ... i would be fine with just X2 now ... (yesterday was too late again __________________
__________________
Ideas are like ocean without borders ! [O] https://twitter.com/FoltynD I support Open Game Protocol RX 585 1.5GHz /8GHz 8GB vstackedGGDR5, 6xDisplayPort 1.4 (HDMI 2.1 & DVI-D dongles included) with SILENT cooling! cmon baby needed CCC features == online up2date Game profiles or ALL features of ATT / RadeonPro (if you fail deliver don't even try say You got technical advantage) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
CAPS CAPS CAPS
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
![]()
Posts: 10,889
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,428
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
The RV670's VLIW arch will never be able to use it's theoretical maximums because it can't run dependent instructions in parallel. For DX10 and OpenGL only- DX9 has a 3 frame buffer limit that prevents 4 way AFR. (so less efficient tactics like "SFR of AFR" have to be employed) In this situation, I'd think 3 way CF would be preferable. Nonetheless, looks good, I like solutions like this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Radeon Arctic Islands
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,757
![]() ![]() |
![]() quad fire and tri sli are both gonna have terrible scaling and wont be worth the money.
__________________
"you son of a ***** do u think you can elude us forever carlos" http://gawker.com/5002269/the-cruise...ed-to-suppress AHAHAHAH WTF IS HE TALKING ABOUT?????????? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Radeon R700
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV-426
Posts: 760
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() But whats the "average" utilisation of the stream processors in modern games anyway.... or better, what can be expected? 75% maybe? R(V)6xx is running 64 vec5 threads right? So it would have to run at like 80% to match nVidias shaders performance....
__________________
Gigabyte P35C DS3R, E6750, Leadtek Winfast PX8800 GTS 512MB, 3GB Kingston DDR2 800, Seagate 250GB ST3250820AS, Samsung 160GB SV160N, Terratec DMX 6fire 24/96, Silverstone ST60F 600W |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Che cazzo stai dicendo?
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
![]()
Posts: 1,992
![]() ![]() |
![]() If it works on P35 motherboards it will might be a nice option for those folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Radeon R700
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 950
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,428
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
If you have $40K a year to work with, quad fire and tri sli probably aren't worth it to you. If you have a $150K a year, spending $900-$1500 on video cards may well be "worth it to you". If you have less money, but value gaming highly and want to spend your disposable on computer parts instead of golf, it might be worth it to get double the speed for triple the price. Only the buyer can decide what something is "worth" to them- there's no formula or rule. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,428
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
My point was just that "You may have the physical 1280 shaders, but there are factors that will limit their use." Having 1280 shaders sounds a lot better than it will actually be, in terms of performance. When you consider having 320 shaders brought the 2900XT to the level of the 98 shader 8800GTS for the most part, a massive shader advantage doesn't seem to be the key factor here- parallel instructions, shader speed, and texture fillrate seem to be the key components of these card's performance equation. My .02. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
EGG
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
![]()
Posts: 2,833
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
The more SPs the more wastage (in terms of shader power, percentage should remain the same if the whole ratio scales), but in terms of diesize vs performance, the R600 architecture still has a big advantage there. Heck, R600 has 320 SPs + a fatty 512-bit bus, and it's still 10+% smaller than the G80! I'm not even including NVIO. ![]() 190mm^2 vs 320mm^2 is quite a big difference in chip size, even when G92 has 16 more SPs to unlock. If nVidia manufactured G92 in 55nm, it would still have 271++ mm^2 as the die size as its best case scenario. What I'd say is: If R600 wasn't a fiasco financially, if AMD/ATI wasn't strapped for cash/market performance, 480SPs + better ratio on a hypothetical chip will become the new flagship in TOTAL performance. It's 1.5X performance scaling, plus some more percentage if they have more TA/TF units and RBEs. This hypothetical die would reside in the high 3XX/ low 4XX mm^2 area, and for a flagship, seems normal. You could clock it at ~700Mhz, it shouldn't too much- the current 3800s don't- and end up at 140-150W TDP. But of course, they'd be swimming in MORE red if they went that way. The 8800GT would dominate sub $300, leaving this hypothetical chip little to compete in 400+ market, something that ATI can give up for now given its kinda shady stigma of the 2900XT. Plus, it'd take more $$$ to engineer such thing. 2 RV670s on 1 board has the distinct advantages of a much smaller chip, flexibility in terms of yields, and still high margins for ATI. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HD 2950XT (RV670) ships next month | Sound_Card | Radeon Rumour Mill [Archived] | 557 | Nov 22, 2007 08:54 AM |
RV670 comes ever so closer.... | Sound_Card | Feedback Central | 11 | Nov 14, 2007 03:34 PM |
AMD price cut RV670 179$-239$ | Burn | AMD Radeon Discussion and Support | 18 | Nov 14, 2007 08:09 AM |
Gecube HD 3800 AKA RV670!?! | Agustus | AMD Radeon Discussion and Support | 3 | Oct 18, 2007 12:56 PM |
the photo of RV670 model | frankexam | Radeon Rumour Mill [Archived] | 12 | Aug 26, 2007 03:06 PM |