Go Back   Rage3D » Rage3D Discussion Area » Archived Discussions » Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking
Rage3D Subscribe Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking Discuss Radeon tweaking, modding, and overclocking practices. Want to post your benchmarks scores? This is the place!

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 18, 2006, 05:43 PM   #31
Advertisement (Guests Only)

Login or Register to remove this ad
3_Stooges_Nuke
Curly+Moe+Shemp=Hero's
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,204
3_Stooges_Nuke is still being judged by the masses


Default

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098

7372, nothing overclocked. not bad.
__________________

ASUS P5E
Intel XQ6850 Quad Core (3.4Ghz)
Visiontek HD 4870
PC Power and Cooling 1000 WATT PS
EXOS Water Cooling for CPU and NorthBridge
4 GIG Mushkin DDR2 RAM
4x WD WD4000YR 400gig SATA HD's.
2x Samsung DVD Burners.
Windows XP SP2
3_Stooges_Nuke is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 05:45 PM   #32
3_Stooges_Nuke
Curly+Moe+Shemp=Hero's
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,204
3_Stooges_Nuke is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiTaN
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098

I'm close. I'm suprised your CPU score was so low. your video scores really seemed to spank my crashfire though.
__________________

ASUS P5E
Intel XQ6850 Quad Core (3.4Ghz)
Visiontek HD 4870
PC Power and Cooling 1000 WATT PS
EXOS Water Cooling for CPU and NorthBridge
4 GIG Mushkin DDR2 RAM
4x WD WD4000YR 400gig SATA HD's.
2x Samsung DVD Burners.
Windows XP SP2
3_Stooges_Nuke is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 05:52 PM   #33
OverclockN'
Radeon Arctic Islands
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States Iowa
Posts: 23,085
OverclockN' can recite pi backwardsOverclockN' can recite pi backwardsOverclockN' can recite pi backwardsOverclockN' can recite pi backwardsOverclockN' can recite pi backwardsOverclockN' can recite pi backwardsOverclockN' can recite pi backwards


Subscriber
Default

4292

Didn't do any changes, but just ran it again so I could get a link.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8194
__________________
In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity...Albert Einstein
-------------------------------------------------------
OverclockN' is offline  
Advertisement (Guests Only)
Login or Register to remove this ad
Old Jan 18, 2006, 06:40 PM   #34
apollooff320
Radeon R520
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 354
apollooff320 is still being judged by the masses


Default

__________________
AMD X2 [email protected]
300Gb Harddrive
MSI 7800GT 450/1200
2GB OCZ EL Platinum DDR400
19'' Benq FP91G+
Logitech Z-5500
apollooff320 is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 06:57 PM   #35
BroadbandGamer
Radeon R700
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 908
BroadbandGamer is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vogon
Yeah Nvidia gave futuremark a bung

Seriously, there is no reason for there to be such a difference ... I have had 7800gtx and x1800xt and in gaming theres not much in it speedwise, of course better drivers on ATi

Wonder if you do the test with 4xAA on HDR, then ATi should, by rights, score better 'cos nvidia cant do that ?

downloading now to see what its all about anyhoo ...
Vogon,

Since you have a X1800 XT and 7800 GTX. Which one do you prefer? I just got my kids X1800 XT and I'm thinking about giving him my 7800 GTX and taking the X1800 XT. What do you think?
__________________
A64 X2 4400+ | ASUS A8N-SLI Premium | ATI X1900 XTX | 74GB Raptor | Antec TP-II 550 | Lian Li PC-65B Sony DRU-700A | TWINX2048-3200C2 | Dell 2005FPW | G5 |Audigy 2 ZS | Saitek Eclipse | Wingman Freedom 2.4
BroadbandGamer is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 07:15 PM   #36
TiTaN
Bzzzt....HA!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mt. Zion, IL
Posts: 2,139
TiTaN is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3_Stooges_Nuke
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8098

I'm close. I'm suprised your CPU score was so low. your video scores really seemed to spank my crashfire though.
Well, since this is brand new I'd say the dual-cores will really shine, even ahead of the almight FX-57...which is why an FX-60 is in my near future
__________________
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 4MB |
| Asus P5W-DH Deluxe (1101) |
| eVGA 7950GX2 @ 574/1520 |
| 2GB TWIN2X2048 - 6400C4 |
| 2x150GB WD Raptor - Raid0 |
| Logitech Z5500 5.1 500W |
| Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty |
| 24" WS HP A7217A |
TiTaN is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 07:42 PM   #37
Evileh
Keep your pimp hip strong
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: United States Springfield, Illinois
Posts: 9,204
Evileh knows why the caged bird singsEvileh knows why the caged bird singsEvileh knows why the caged bird singsEvileh knows why the caged bird singsEvileh knows why the caged bird sings


Default

Holy Sh1t!!!!!! 962... I haven't seen that since my old computer ran 3dmarks 04... omfg.... And that's when I got a new one...
__________________
Battlefield 2 Stats
Battlefield 2142 Stats
Battlefield Bad Company 2 Stats
Battlefield 3 Stats
Xfire evilgenius84
Xbox Live Gamer's Tag: Evileh

Sittal on BF2142 "
wtf. seriously. this has got to be the worst game i have EVER played. far worse than left behind."
Evileh is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 08:26 PM   #38
busboy
I'm the wallet inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canada Ontario
Posts: 871
busboy is still being judged by the masses


Default

well my laptop got a 394 (2.13 M 1GB ram and a fire GL 3200) I havent ran my home system yet but i will post the results cause this sucks hehe. On a brighter note i dont plan on playing 3dmark
busboy is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 08:31 PM   #39
HisSvt2
Radeon R420
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 201
HisSvt2 is still being judged by the masses


Default

fresh install and Cat 6.1 new crossfire X1600XT setup http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10519
__________________
Gateway 6831-FX Laptop
Vista X64
Intel Core 2 duo T8300
4Gb [email protected]
2X250GB raid 0
8800M GTS 512MB

DS/Xbox/Dreamcast/N64/Gamecube/XBOX 360/PS3/Wii
HisSvt2 is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 08:34 PM   #40
greasyhands
Vega 64
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: United States Minnesota
Posts: 852
greasyhands is still being judged by the masses


Default


Last edited by greasyhands : Jan 18, 2006 at 08:53 PM.
greasyhands is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 09:04 PM   #41
Ravenhaft
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9
Ravenhaft is still being judged by the masses


Default

5.13 Drivers Score = 4595
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10758

This is running the overclocks I normally run my system at. Overclocking didn't raise my score much, just from like 4100 to almost 4600. Or maybe that is pretty significant, I guess that's what, a 10% increase? I hear that the R520 series doesn't score as well as it should, as 3dmark06 doesn't make good use of flow control, and the shader 2.0 stuff is biased towards nvidia. That's all from Techreport, I have no idea, we'll have to see and I'm excited about R580.

LOL HisSVt2 I was freaking out for a second, wondering how you got scores on par with mine with x1600 XT, then realized you were running in Crossfire, lol

Last edited by Ravenhaft : Jan 18, 2006 at 09:10 PM.
Ravenhaft is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 09:16 PM   #42
ShaidarHaran
Radeon Arctic Islands
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: United States twin cities
Posts: 24,941
ShaidarHaran once won a refrigerator on 'The Price is Right'ShaidarHaran once won a refrigerator on 'The Price is Right'ShaidarHaran once won a refrigerator on 'The Price is Right'ShaidarHaran once won a refrigerator on 'The Price is Right'ShaidarHaran once won a refrigerator on 'The Price is Right'ShaidarHaran once won a refrigerator on 'The Price is Right'


Default

I'm taking these initial scores with a grain of salt, to say the least. Until it is known precisely why NV cards score so much higher than comparable ATI cards, I'd say something smells a wee bit fishy here. Could just be a lack of optimizations on ATI's part, but I'm leaning more towards this benchmark being written specifically NV hardware in mind.

Edit: for the sake of clarity, I'm not saying this is a bad benchmark (yet) because it produces higher scores on NV hardware, but because it produces significantly higher scores across the entire range of NV hardware. When you've got a benchmark that says a 6600GT is significantly faster than an X800 GTO, something is wrong with said benchmark. Let alone when said benchmark produces a higher SM 2.0 score for the 6600GT than the X800 GTO. That's just plain silly. There is absolutely no evidence of the 6600GT being faster @ SM2.0 than the X800 GTO in the real world, so why does this benchmark produce this result?

Last edited by ShaidarHaran : Jan 18, 2006 at 09:25 PM.
ShaidarHaran is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 09:34 PM   #43
CrazyOtter
4870X2
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada Ireland
Posts: 70
CrazyOtter is still being judged by the masses


Default

The X1800XT is running at 690/800.
I think the results are getting too distorted by dual cpu scores to be a very good benchmark. These results don't translate to real world gaming score at all anymore. With any current games, and probably for quite a bit of this year the faster single core performs better than any dual core CPU.

Also, this version will seemingly only run smooth if you spend more than 800 Euro on a single video card.
This benchmark gets uninstalled until I upgrade to R600/G80....when it probably should have been released.
Slideshows hurt my eyes.


CrazyOtter is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 10:12 PM   #44
SSXeon
CAPS CAPS CAPS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States Virginia
Posts: 10,781
SSXeon once held a door open for a complete strangerSSXeon once held a door open for a complete strangerSSXeon once held a door open for a complete stranger


Default

__________________



Thermaltake Core V51
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7Ghz (1.23V)
Wrath Spire HSF w/ MX4 @ 2500RPM
MSI B350 Tomahawk
16GB Corsair LPX 2400Mhz 14-16-16-31
500GB WD Blue 3D Nand SSD (OS)
2TB WD Red HDD
4TB WD Red HDD
Nvidia RTX 2080 SUPER FE 8GB @ 1650/1935/7751Mhz
Dell 27" S2716DG 1440p @ 144Hz
Razor DeathAdder 6400dpi Mouse
Corsair K55 RGB Gaming Keyboard
Xbox One Wireless Controller
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
WHQL 436.15






Coolermaster N200
Intel Core-i3 4170 @ 3.7Ghz
Xigmatek 1283 HSF + Thermaltake CL-F005
MSI H81M-P33
8GB Corsair Vengence 1600Mhz 9-9-9-24
500GB WD Blue HDD (OS)
2TB WD Red HDD
2TB WD Red HDD
Intel HD 4400 350/1150Mhz
Corsair CX600 PSU
Dell 21.5" S2209WB 1080p @ 60Hz
Razor Lachesis 5400dpi Mouse
Windows 10 Home 64-bit
WHQL 15.36.28.4332






Thermaltake Versa H15
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.5Ghz
Wrath Stealth HSF w/ MX4
8GB Corsair LPX 2400Mhz 14-16-16-31
1TB WD Blue HDD (OS)
EVGA GTX 970 FTW 4GB @ 1216/1367/3500MHz
Oculus Rift Touch
Samsung 55" MU6290 HDR 2160p @ 60Hz
Windows 10 Home 64-bit
WHQL 388.00






Dell Latitude 5270
Intel Core-i5 6300u @ 2.4Ghz
4GB DDR4 2133Mhz
500GB WD Blue 3D Nand SSD (OS)
Intel HD 520 300/1050Mhz
Dell 12.5" 768p @ 60Hz
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
WHQL 20.19.15.4390

SSXeon is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 10:32 PM   #45
DooMeous
Radeon R200
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 81
DooMeous is still being judged by the masses


Default

DooMeous is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 10:32 PM   #46
friskyolive
Looking down on you!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 7,458
friskyolive is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bratboy
Well have an x800xtpe. Got a whoopin 2015 hehe. Will try and run a real clean run later
That was the exact same score I got! Sad, isn't it, heheh.
__________________
See how his nose twitches? Something smells about this, and it's not stinking clouds from his furry backside! *Quote from Minsc.*
Overstep your boundaries, and look beyond your scope of vision.


[CPU]: AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad Core Processor AM3 3.4GHZ 8MB Cache 125W 45NM [MOBO]: ASUS M4A78T-E ATX 790GX Socket AM3 DDR3 2PCI-E16 2PCI-E1 2PCI HDMI Video Sound GBLAN Motherboard[GPU]: Powercolor Radeon HD 5770 In Crossfire [SOUND]: Corsair Gaming Audio Series CA-HS1A Headset 50MM Drivers Circumaural Earcups and the Creative Sound Blaster X-FI TITANIUM Fatality PRO with Yamaha 5590 Receiver[MEMORY]: OCZ (OCZ3G1600LV4GK) DDR3 1600MHz Gold Edition Low Voltage 4GB (2x2048MB) Dual Channel and G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB [MONITOR]: DELL U2410, 24W, OPT/FPWS,CUS [HD]: Western Digital 320GB and 1 TB Black Edition [Optical Drives]: LG GSA-4167B Dual Layer DVD±R/RW Drive [PSU]: Corsair HX 1000 watt [OS]: Win7 64-bit Professional On a Antec 1200 Full Tower Case.
friskyolive is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 10:34 PM   #47
SSXeon
CAPS CAPS CAPS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States Virginia
Posts: 10,781
SSXeon once held a door open for a complete strangerSSXeon once held a door open for a complete strangerSSXeon once held a door open for a complete stranger


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DooMeous
HOLY SH!T!!

SSXeon
__________________



Thermaltake Core V51
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7Ghz (1.23V)
Wrath Spire HSF w/ MX4 @ 2500RPM
MSI B350 Tomahawk
16GB Corsair LPX 2400Mhz 14-16-16-31
500GB WD Blue 3D Nand SSD (OS)
2TB WD Red HDD
4TB WD Red HDD
Nvidia RTX 2080 SUPER FE 8GB @ 1650/1935/7751Mhz
Dell 27" S2716DG 1440p @ 144Hz
Razor DeathAdder 6400dpi Mouse
Corsair K55 RGB Gaming Keyboard
Xbox One Wireless Controller
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
WHQL 436.15






Coolermaster N200
Intel Core-i3 4170 @ 3.7Ghz
Xigmatek 1283 HSF + Thermaltake CL-F005
MSI H81M-P33
8GB Corsair Vengence 1600Mhz 9-9-9-24
500GB WD Blue HDD (OS)
2TB WD Red HDD
2TB WD Red HDD
Intel HD 4400 350/1150Mhz
Corsair CX600 PSU
Dell 21.5" S2209WB 1080p @ 60Hz
Razor Lachesis 5400dpi Mouse
Windows 10 Home 64-bit
WHQL 15.36.28.4332






Thermaltake Versa H15
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.5Ghz
Wrath Stealth HSF w/ MX4
8GB Corsair LPX 2400Mhz 14-16-16-31
1TB WD Blue HDD (OS)
EVGA GTX 970 FTW 4GB @ 1216/1367/3500MHz
Oculus Rift Touch
Samsung 55" MU6290 HDR 2160p @ 60Hz
Windows 10 Home 64-bit
WHQL 388.00






Dell Latitude 5270
Intel Core-i5 6300u @ 2.4Ghz
4GB DDR4 2133Mhz
500GB WD Blue 3D Nand SSD (OS)
Intel HD 520 300/1050Mhz
Dell 12.5" 768p @ 60Hz
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
WHQL 20.19.15.4390

SSXeon is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 10:53 PM   #48
Mike EFix
Radeon R100
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 34
Mike EFix is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian48
Here's MINE!!



Dell 9100
P4 3.0ghz, HT
128mb X300SE (on-board PCI-E x16)
512mb DDR2 (2x256mb)

Yes, I'm at the office right now

Gottcha beat!!

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12097
__________________
Intel Q6600 G0 3.7GHz
ATI Radeon 3870CF
2*GSkill 2gig
3*WD 320KS Raid 0
1*300Gig Samsung
Asus Maximus Formula 0907
Seasonic 700W
Sony DVD/R
this sig was automatically shortened to meet the 10-lines max rule
Mike EFix is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 11:05 PM   #49
Brian48
Rage3D Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,215
Brian48 is still being judged by the masses


Default

OK, finally got around to running it on my home machines. Normally the CPUs are overclocked, but for these tests, I kept everything at factory default

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9550
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8592

Pretty intense benchmark.
Brian48 is offline  
Old Jan 18, 2006, 11:35 PM   #50
Supra_Freak
I did this to your momma!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada Delhi Ontario, Canada
Posts: 7,012
Supra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled withSupra_Freak is not someone to be trifled with


Default

I finally got around to running it on my home machine as well...

6800GT Stock 350/1000 = 2374
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/pr...rojectId=12140

GPU Overclock 400/1120 = 2502
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12348

Pretty crazy benchmark id say, im surprised i did so well.... if you can even call that good?!?!?!
__________________


Last edited by Supra_Freak : Jan 19, 2006 at 06:48 PM.
Supra_Freak is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 01:19 AM   #51
CactusClown
#endif
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hungary Hungary
Posts: 683
CactusClown is still being judged by the masses


Red face

My scores:



Pretty insane score, isn't it?
(Using Catalyst 5.11. Won't install newer for a benchmark. Everything else works fine.)

Only the demo runs. Draws 3-5 frames, then waits seconds, then 3-5 frames again, etc...
__________________
Athlon 64 3200+ (@2400) | AC Freezer 64 | Asus A8N-SLI SE | Zalman ZM-NBF47 | 2*512 MB DDR400 Hynix+Samsung (dual channel, 2.5-3-3-8, 1T) | Inno3D GeForce 7600 GST 256MB| Primecooler VGAHG1 Cu | LG F700B | PSU: 450W Chieftec | Audigy1 | 80G Maxtor | 160G Seagate | NEC 2510A

S3 Virge -> Voodoo1 -> TNT2 -> GF2 MX400 -> GF3 Ti200 -> 9600XT -> [email protected] -> GF4 MX420 -> GF 7600 GST
CactusClown is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 03:09 AM   #52
Vogon
Radeon R420
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 338
Vogon is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadbandGamer
Vogon,

Since you have a X1800 XT and 7800 GTX. Which one do you prefer? I just got my kids X1800 XT and I'm thinking about giving him my 7800 GTX and taking the X1800 XT. What do you think?
Speedwise for 95% of games nothing in it, the other 5% is a case of swings and roundabouts.
I prefer the X1800 'cos I feel ATi has better drivers, and nicer IQ.
When I had the GTX(s) there was always something that wouldn't work quite as it should.
Also the drivers from ATi are updated regulary so you know if there is a problem a fix shouldn't be far away, nvidia tend to be irregular and dont listen too any problems ... one game I had problems with has never been fixed since the release of the 7800gtx ... well it was ... by the devs as they got fed up waiting for nvidia to sort it .. it always ran flawless on ATi.

So yes I much prefer the X1800

@ ShaidarHaran, 100% in agreement with your views on Nvidia scoring higher across the board... except even if the scores were close were they should be, I still think its not a particulary good indication of game performance ... Hell, a card from 2 generations ago wouldn't run that slowly in modern games ...
__________________
EVGA 680i - C2D 6600 @ 3.5 ghz - 4x1024mb Geil PC6400 - Akasa Eclipse /w Enermax Galaxy 1000W - - WD 250Gb 16mb Cache SATA2 - HD2900XT 1024mb - Pioneer 111 DVD-/+DL RW - Pioneer 110 DVD-/+DL - HP LP2465 24" Widescreen TFT
Vogon is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 04:08 AM   #53
wunderbar
Rage3D Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,308
wunderbar is still being judged by the masses


Default

2801 for my socket A / 6800 GT rig, not bad
wunderbar is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 05:36 AM   #54
Doozer
lollollollol
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: England SE London, UK
Posts: 19,033
Doozer knows why the caged bird singsDoozer knows why the caged bird singsDoozer knows why the caged bird singsDoozer knows why the caged bird singsDoozer knows why the caged bird sings


Default

No scores yet ? Guess 3DMark06 kills pc's

I will test mine when I get home tonight
__________________
Mobo : Asus P8777-V LX2 Processor : Intel Core i5 3570K 3.40GHz @ 4.40GHz Memory : 8Gb RAM
Graphics Card : GeForce GTX 690 Sound : Asus Xonar DGX 5.1 O/S : Win7, Monitor : 3 x Samsung 23"

Nikon D7100,
Nikkor 16-35mf f4
Sigma 120-400mm
Nikon 18-55mm kit lens,
Sigma 70-300 APO Macro,
Nikkor 50mm f1.8,
Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro HSM,
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DG,
Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 HSM,
Sigma x2 TC
Remote shutter release ,
Raynox D250 closeup/macro attachment,
Kenko extension tubes,
reverse lens adaptor,
Nikon SB800 flash,
Vivitar 285HV Flash unit,
Tripod (x2),
Monopod



Rage3d flickr Group
Doozer is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 07:08 AM   #55
Fates Warning
Radeon R300
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 143
Fates Warning is still being judged by the masses


Default

I ran it just once and here's what I got:

3DMark Score: 1667
SM2.0 Score: 909
CPU Score: 592

It's a slide show on the CPU tests.
Fates Warning is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 07:53 AM   #56
Brian48
Rage3D Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,215
Brian48 is still being judged by the masses


Default

Yeah, for the first time in nearly two years, my CPU actually feels like the bottleneck. That's a weird feeling
Brian48 is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 08:17 AM   #57
ewitte
Radeon R100
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 31
ewitte is still being judged by the masses


Default

ewitte is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 08:55 AM   #58
TiTaN
Bzzzt....HA!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mt. Zion, IL
Posts: 2,139
TiTaN is still being judged by the masses


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DooMeous
Right under you...just need my FX-60

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=19134

Edit: If you'll notice, my SLI kicks your crossfires ass
__________________
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 4MB |
| Asus P5W-DH Deluxe (1101) |
| eVGA 7950GX2 @ 574/1520 |
| 2GB TWIN2X2048 - 6400C4 |
| 2x150GB WD Raptor - Raid0 |
| Logitech Z5500 5.1 500W |
| Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty |
| 24" WS HP A7217A |

Last edited by TiTaN : Jan 19, 2006 at 09:03 AM.
TiTaN is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 08:58 AM   #59
VW_Factor
ÜBERVERBOTEN!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Germany Leesburg, GA
Posts: 21,767
VW_Factor can recite pi backwardsVW_Factor can recite pi backwardsVW_Factor can recite pi backwardsVW_Factor can recite pi backwardsVW_Factor can recite pi backwardsVW_Factor can recite pi backwardsVW_Factor can recite pi backwards


Default

I got around to doing a clean run this morning without too much going on in the background.

Not shabby.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=19006

Strangely enough, my reported core clock is the low power. *scraches head* oh well.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeemed
Granted, this is coming from the fella' who's had over 1,000lbs of bucking muscle under neath him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Smith
"Fail" = verb "Failure" = noun
VW_Factor is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2006, 09:26 AM   #60
ziimen
Radeon R420
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 279
ziimen is still being judged by the masses


Default

Hey supra-freak, I got the same card clocked 415/1150. These are the scores:

3DMark Score 2763 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1163 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 1063 Marks
CPU Score 1063 Marks

I was doing 2584 with 81.95 drivers. Try 81.98, they're "certified" by futuremark anyway.
__________________
Q9550 @ 4Ghz
EVGA 790i-Ultra
Mushkin 4GB @ 1900Mhz 8-7-7-18
EVGA GTX 275 @ FTW
WD 150GB Velociraptor + 500GB RE3
Samsung 226BW

ziimen is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange 3DMark'06 results titomax82 Radeon Tweaking, Modding, and Overclocking 7 Jan 31, 2007 04:42 AM
The Official WMD thread MasterGoa Off Topic Lounge 7 Jul 13, 2003 09:34 PM
The Official "Random Phrase from Off-topic Thread Titles" thread! _leech_ Off Topic Lounge 17 May 22, 2003 07:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Copyright ©1998-2011 Rage3D.com
Links monetized by VigLink