Official Digi Cam Pic Thread! - Page 435

Tyr-Sog · Oct 8, 2018, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahjik

Looking forward to seeing from photos from you with it.. I'm sure they will be good, but the camera itself is an absolute stunner! Congrats!

Thanks man. I've been cameraless for awhile now so I'm looking forward to
being able to get out and shoot again. I could have gotten anything really but decided on used and to stick with a budget this time around. I just don't have the time to shoot and don't want to spend gobs of $$$'s again on gear.
With the budget I set I could have gotten a used D810(shot for a year), D750, or even a D500 again. All far more advanced then the 2013 released DF.
I know it's limitations with it's AF(same as D7000/D600, i shoot both) which will mostly be in lower light situations.
16mp many consider a limitation but lets be honest here, it's an awesome 16mp with the D4 sensor(some say even modified for the better) with clairty and certain magic to its rendering.

Yes, I'm really looking forward to shooting this camera. Now I just need so glass. I may dive in to the older MF stuff

Lazy8s · Oct 9, 2018, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahjik

Looking forward to seeing from photos from you with it.. I'm sure they will be good, but the camera itself is an absolute stunner! Congrats!

Same here! I have zero shoot time this year...

Mahjik · Oct 9, 2018, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyr-Sog

16mp many consider a limitation but lets be honest here, it's an awesome 16mp with the D4 sensor(some say even modified for the better) with clairty and certain magic to its rendering.

I used to shoot with a Minolta 7D which was 6.1mp... To be honest, some of my better photos were with that camera.

RFtinkerer · Oct 23, 2018, 09:56 AM

I was curious to see what you all thought of this...interpretation...of Barnard's Loop, the Orion's Belt area. This was shot with a Rokinon 135 f2 and QSI 583wsg monochrome CCD, using different filters. What I did was used red, green, and blue channel data and then hydrogen alpha narrowband for additional dust, emissions and set it for luminance as well for smaller stars and the ripply patterns in the dust. Dust areas are orange...naturally a dark orange color, while the hydrogen alpha emssions are a deep red, then I shifted those kind of funky. Truthfully, I've been tired of trying to duplicate the natural look and kind of like the results. My wife loves them, but other astrophotographers are more purists so they hate it.

Good, bad, just ugly?

**logical** · Oct 23, 2018, 10:01 AM

From a non-astronomer, a certainly looks cool and like something from space.

I just find it weird that there has to be an interpretation and you cant really replicate its normal look just by taking the picture. Of course we are talking about space photography and I get why but a 1 to 1 accurate picture would be cool.

Are all deep space pictures just interpretations of what they think something should look like?

RFtinkerer · Oct 23, 2018, 10:55 AM

There's major discussion about this, and reasons why not to do true color. The problem is intepretation. What really is red? Green? It's just electromagnetic radiation. Your brain is processing images for a white balance, different under different lighting conditions, note the shift as you go from one environment to another. Companies spend millions trying to do it for DSLRs, cameras. I included not only red, green, blue channels in the composite but also narrowband Ha data...that is not natural, but adds the fluctuating detail. A lot of shots are done from narrowband Ha, SII, OIII, and put in a false color to emphasize structure. Reference the following article:

http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/...the.night.sky/

This is Orion, in 'true color', from Roger Clark's DSLR shot (sideways from the prior mosaic).

This is a wider shot I processed from the 9 panel mosaic, more representative but still with reduced size stars and an emphasis on nebular structure:

I could get it close by only using the red, green, and blue channels and shift around, specifically lower reds and keeping the stars big. I personally don't like the more natural image.

It ain't as God intended, is it?

I just like processing to make stuff pretty, in my opinion, or funky as in the prior case.

RFtinkerer · Oct 23, 2018, 11:35 AM

Okay, I was curious to see if I could get closer to true color and Roger Clark's image by not using the Ha data and then just a histogram stretch, curving the hue lightness to approximate my thoughts on the sensitivity of the human eye, using the PhotometricCalibration sequence in Pixinsight. Here are the results:

The point spread function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_spread_function) of the stars is smaller due to the larger effective aperture of the 9 panel mosaic with the 135 mm f2 compared to Roger Clark's lens, but closer to the image and true color, I think.

necropimp · Oct 23, 2018, 01:41 PM

couldn't resist taking a pic of this thing after it came in for new tires last week

the way the fading light and the lighting from the building/lot worked with the exposure gave it a vintage advertising photo vibe IMO

**logical** · Oct 23, 2018, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RFtinkerer

There's major discussion about this, and reasons why not to do true color. The problem is intepretation. What really is red? Green? It's just electromagnetic radiation. Your brain is processing images for a white balance, different under different lighting conditions, note the shift as you go from one environment to another. Companies spend millions trying to do it for DSLRs, cameras. I included not only red, green, blue channels in the composite but also narrowband Ha data...that is not natural, but adds the fluctuating detail. A lot of shots are done from narrowband Ha, SII, OIII, and put in a false color to emphasize structure. Reference the following article:

I dont know much of anything about how the brain and our eyes interpret colors but I do know how the general population tend to see them as. When DSLRs interpret and process pictures they tend to try to make them as we see them. A red apple is red in the picture(general hue of it changes based on processing) but red still stays a red. DSLRs dont turn a red apple into green. With these space photos it just seems to be that they are interpreted to be most pleasing or cool to look at.

What I want to know is if we were placed in front of something far away in space could we replicate what we saw in person through these deep spaces photos?

Then again just thinking about it the scale of the picture is so big that humans wouldnt be able to see it.

Maybe we would just see nothing and there are no colors at all at the scale we can actually see with our own eyes.

Space is too damn complicated

Quote:

Originally Posted by necropimp

couldn't resist taking a pic of this thing after it came in for new tires last week

the way the fading light and the lighting from the building/lot worked with the exposure gave it a vintage advertising photo vibe IMO

Tell him to find a proper parking spot

RFtinkerer · Oct 23, 2018, 02:53 PM

Oh...you are correct, white is white, red is red, white balance doesn't do anything under realistic lighting conditions. OR DOES IT?!?!?

This is one my waterfall photos shot in Canon RAW, where the left is set to 'daylight balanced', then I switched it to 'tungsten', which is incandescent lighting indoors. No other setting was changed between the two before export, no exaggerations here. Flourescents get funky too...

Space isn't the only weird thing with lighting...

Seeing color for nebula is so darn difficult. Generally the most you can see in bright ones is a greenish hue, such as in the Orion nebula, because the oxygen III emissions are actually strong enough to stimulate your comparatively sensitive green color receptors. But, in long exposures, even set to 'daylight balance' on the DSLR you get dominant reds, blues, because it exposes differently. So it's not the same. You can get something you can say is close, like Roger Clark's published true color images. I just...don't like them. It's art at some point, you know?

Edit: Looking further, this might be more helpful around the Orion nebula: http://clarkvision.com/articles/colo...rstellar.dust/

Kind of want revise my prior image, but who knows. Still a pain.

necropimp · Oct 23, 2018, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by logical

Tell him to find a proper parking spot

that is a proper parking spot for completed customer vehicles, i parked it there

Tyr-Sog · Oct 24, 2018, 07:29 PM

Haven't really had the chance to use the Df but caught this rainfall over a soccer-field yesterday.

I only havr the 50 1.8G right now.

It wasn't on my radar(yet anyways) but my newly inquired immaculate nikkor 300 2.8 VRii is on the way.

Both my kids play soccer and my GF's 3 sons play soccer. Two in travel and 1 in college. So I'll be shooting a **** ton of it. If the Df can't keep up I may sell it and buy a D4. I think I'll be fine though as I was never one to spray and prey shots. I usually time my shots with single clicks.

Tyr-Sog · Oct 24, 2018, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RFtinkerer

I was curious to see what you all thought of this...interpretation...of Barnard's Loop, the Orion's Belt area. This was shot with a Rokinon 135 f2 and QSI 583wsg monochrome CCD, using different filters. What I did was used red, green, and blue channel data and then hydrogen alpha narrowband for additional dust, emissions and set it for luminance as well for smaller stars and the ripply patterns in the dust. Dust areas are orange...naturally a dark orange color, while the hydrogen alpha emssions are a deep red, then I shifted those kind of funky. Truthfully, I've been tired of trying to duplicate the natural look and kind of like the results. My wife loves them, but other astrophotographers are more purists so they hate it.

Good, bad, just ugly?

It's amazing seeing the wide shots and seeing how much is just going on. Usually we just see the orion nebula, horse head, or some other section but to see it all going on is just stunning.

I'd like to get the Df under some dark skys soon.

lmchv · Oct 26, 2018, 10:38 PM

A couple of pics from my trip to Cuzco.

Machu Picchu!

Tyr-Sog · Oct 27, 2018, 09:09 AM

awesome!

Tyr-Sog · Nov 2, 2018, 02:55 PM

Some Halloween shots, nothing special. All quick snaps as we walked on a crowded street.

All with the 50 1.8g

iso 12800

iso 12800

iso 9000

iso 8000

iso 1800

Tyr-Sog · Nov 4, 2018, 07:20 PM

Mahjik · Nov 5, 2018, 11:13 AM

Nice!

Using the new lens?

Tyr-Sog · Nov 5, 2018, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahjik

Nice!

Using the new lens?

Yes the new one

Mahjik · Nov 6, 2018, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyr-Sog

Yes the new one

Ugh... You are making me want to go out and find a new lens...

Tyr-Sog · Nov 7, 2018, 06:34 PM

Tyr-Sog · Nov 7, 2018, 06:37 PM

Tyr-Sog · Nov 7, 2018, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahjik

Ugh... You are making me want to go out and find a new lens...

The 300 f2.8 vrii is a lot heavier then I thought it would be. I'm still in decent shape at 42 and it gets heavy out it the field for me. I mostly always handhold to. I'm not a fan of tri/mono-pod work but on rare occasions will use one.

Tyr-Sog · Nov 10, 2018, 11:19 AM

bluejay

Tyr-Sog · Dec 7, 2018, 06:56 PM

MasterGoa · Dec 8, 2018, 07:21 PM

People will not realize how difficult those are to photograph

Bit of front focus maybe?

Tyr-Sog · Dec 9, 2018, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterGoa

People will not realize how difficult those are to photograph

Bit of front focus maybe?

Yes, they're quick and skittish. They don't sit still for a second lol. Not to mention on Full Frame with only a 300mm lens haha.

It may be but I think it's more of my hand-holding this lens(300 2.8 vrii) with VR off.
It's new to me so I'm not use to the weight distribution on my new body(Df, which is light). Saying that, I also may be missing the eye and with shooting at 2.8 that narrow
DOF is at play. It may also be I only had the SS at 1600. I'm sure there is some motion blur here also.

When I get free time I'll test for sure any front or rear focusing.

I really do like the colors coming out of this body though.

MasterGoa · Dec 9, 2018, 08:50 PM

Yeah, I got the 200-500mm with the D500 and it's quite a photon capturing tool

Curiously though, the 200-500 is my only Nikon not made in Japan... But its excellent nonetheless...

Tyr-Sog · Dec 14, 2018, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterGoa

Yeah, I got the 200-500mm with the D500 and it's quite a photon capturing tool

Curiously though, the 200-500 is my only Nikon not made in Japan... But its excellent nonetheless...

The 200-500 IQ is in top prime territory. I miss mine.

I'll be selling the 300 2.8 VRII shortly here. I always wanted to try it and it's everything it hyped to be for sure. It's just too much($$$) lens for me to justify what little time I have to get out and shoot.

I'll probably pick up another 200-500.

MasterGoa · Dec 21, 2018, 05:20 PM

Yeah. I have the 300AF-ED in 2.8 and it is a great lens, but it is true I do not take it out anymore...

Tyr-Sog's System Specs
Motherboard	MSI P43 NEO-F
CPU	Intel C2D E8400 @ 3.73MHz(9x415)
Graphics	eVGA GTX 260 SuperClocked Edition
Memory	Corsair TWINX 4GB PC-6400 DDR2 CL5
Cooling Solution	Tuniq Tower 120
Display	SOYO 24" (MVA Panel)
Soundcard & Speakers	Onboard
Hard-Drives	Deskstar T7K500 500GB Sata II
Optical Drives	Samsung oem DVD-RW
Power Supply	Antec 500w Earthwatt
Case	Antec Sonata III 500
Input Devices	Logitech MX510
Operating System	Vista Premium 32

Lazy8s's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus P8H61-LE
CPU	Intel 3570k
Graphics	Zotac AMP! GTX 1070
Memory	16 Gb DDR3 Corsair Dominator
Cooling Solution	Corsair H60 cpu / Arctic Accelero Extreme IV GPU
Display	Samsung 32" 1080p
Soundcard & Speakers	2.1 generic
Hard-Drives	250Gb Intel SSD OS / 500Gb Evo 860 storage
Optical Drives	None
Power Supply	EVGA 850w G2
Case	Corsair 270R
Input Devices	Logitech performance mouse, DS4 controller
Operating System	Win 10

Mahjik's System Specs
Motherboard	Asus Maximus VII Hero
CPU	Intel Core i7-4790K @4.4GHz
Graphics	ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP! Edition
Memory	16GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series
Cooling Solution	Thermaltake NiC C5 120mm Untouchable CPU Cooler
Display	3 x 23" LCD's
Soundcard & Speakers	Creative Sound Blaster Z Gaming Audio Card
Optical Drives	LG BD-RE/BD-ROM
Power Supply	Cooler Master 750W ATX Certified Active PFC
Case	Cooler Master HAF 932
Input Devices	AZIO Levetron Mech5 Mechanical Keyboard
Operating System	Microsoft Windows 8.1 64-bit

Oct 23, 2018, 09:56 AM	#13024
RFtinkerer Not with it Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: N38 51.279 W94 47.951 Posts: 7,725	I was curious to see what you all thought of this...interpretation...of Barnard's Loop, the Orion's Belt area. This was shot with a Rokinon 135 f2 and QSI 583wsg monochrome CCD, using different filters. What I did was used red, green, and blue channel data and then hydrogen alpha narrowband for additional dust, emissions and set it for luminance as well for smaller stars and the ripply patterns in the dust. Dust areas are orange...naturally a dark orange color, while the hydrogen alpha emssions are a deep red, then I shifted those kind of funky. Truthfully, I've been tired of trying to duplicate the natural look and kind of like the results. My wife loves them, but other astrophotographers are more purists so they hate it. Good, bad, just ugly? __________________ The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. - Ecclesiastes 10:2

Oct 23, 2018, 10:01 AM	#13025
logical What is my purpose? Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: * Posts: 21,917	From a non-astronomer, a certainly looks cool and like something from space. I just find it weird that there has to be an interpretation and you cant really replicate its normal look just by taking the picture. Of course we are talking about space photography and I get why but a 1 to 1 accurate picture would be cool. Are all deep space pictures just interpretations of what they think something should look like? __________________

logical's System Specs
Motherboard	EVGA X99 Micro
CPU	i7 5820k @ 4.6ghz
Graphics	RTX 3080 FE
Memory	Corsair LPX 16GB DDR4
Cooling Solution	Corsair H100i
Display	LG CX48 OLED
Soundcard & Speakers	Schiit Modi 2 + Magni 2 + Sennheiser HD650/Logitech Z-5500 Speakers
Hard-Drives	840 Pro SSD, OCZ SSD, Sandisk SSD
Power Supply	Corsair HX850
Case	Corsair Air 240
Input Devices	Drop CTRL Keyboard + Steel Series something
Operating System	Windows 10 Pro
Extra Info	little package, big power

Oct 23, 2018, 10:55 AM	#13026
RFtinkerer Not with it Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: N38 51.279 W94 47.951 Posts: 7,725	There's major discussion about this, and reasons why not to do true color. The problem is intepretation. What really is red? Green? It's just electromagnetic radiation. Your brain is processing images for a white balance, different under different lighting conditions, note the shift as you go from one environment to another. Companies spend millions trying to do it for DSLRs, cameras. I included not only red, green, blue channels in the composite but also narrowband Ha data...that is not natural, but adds the fluctuating detail. A lot of shots are done from narrowband Ha, SII, OIII, and put in a false color to emphasize structure. Reference the following article: http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/...the.night.sky/ This is Orion, in 'true color', from Roger Clark's DSLR shot (sideways from the prior mosaic). This is a wider shot I processed from the 9 panel mosaic, more representative but still with reduced size stars and an emphasis on nebular structure: I could get it close by only using the red, green, and blue channels and shift around, specifically lower reds and keeping the stars big. I personally don't like the more natural image. It ain't as God intended, is it? I just like processing to make stuff pretty, in my opinion, or funky as in the prior case. __________________ The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. - Ecclesiastes 10:2

Oct 23, 2018, 11:35 AM	#13027
RFtinkerer Not with it Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: N38 51.279 W94 47.951 Posts: 7,725	Okay, I was curious to see if I could get closer to true color and Roger Clark's image by not using the Ha data and then just a histogram stretch, curving the hue lightness to approximate my thoughts on the sensitivity of the human eye, using the PhotometricCalibration sequence in Pixinsight. Here are the results: The point spread function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_spread_function) of the stars is smaller due to the larger effective aperture of the 9 panel mosaic with the 135 mm f2 compared to Roger Clark's lens, but closer to the image and true color, I think. __________________ The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. - Ecclesiastes 10:2

Oct 23, 2018, 01:41 PM	#13028
necropimp WRAAAA!!!!! Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Hell Posts: 5,815	couldn't resist taking a pic of this thing after it came in for new tires last week the way the fading light and the lighting from the building/lot worked with the exposure gave it a vintage advertising photo vibe IMO __________________ Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway

necropimp's System Specs
Motherboard	Gigabyte G1.Sniper Z97
CPU	Intel Core i5 4690K @4.3GHz
Graphics	EVGA GTX980Ti Classified 6GB
Memory	16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3 1866
Cooling Solution	Coolermaster Hyper 212EVO
Display	ASUS VP249QGR
Soundcard & Speakers	Onboard Creative Recon3Di & Logitech Z640, Schiit Modi 2 Uber & Sennheiser HD580
Hard-Drives	OCZ Arc 100 120GB SSD, WD Black 1TB & 2TB internal, WD 1TB and 3TB external
Optical Drives	Lite-On IHAS124-14, LG WH16NS40
Power Supply	EVGA 110-B1-0750-VR 750W
Case	Thermaltake Commander G41
Input Devices	Logitech G610, Logitech G502
Operating System	Windows 10

Oct 23, 2018, 02:53 PM	#13030
RFtinkerer Not with it Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: N38 51.279 W94 47.951 Posts: 7,725	Oh...you are correct, white is white, red is red, white balance doesn't do anything under realistic lighting conditions. OR DOES IT?!?!? This is one my waterfall photos shot in Canon RAW, where the left is set to 'daylight balanced', then I switched it to 'tungsten', which is incandescent lighting indoors. No other setting was changed between the two before export, no exaggerations here. Flourescents get funky too... Space isn't the only weird thing with lighting... Seeing color for nebula is so darn difficult. Generally the most you can see in bright ones is a greenish hue, such as in the Orion nebula, because the oxygen III emissions are actually strong enough to stimulate your comparatively sensitive green color receptors. But, in long exposures, even set to 'daylight balance' on the DSLR you get dominant reds, blues, because it exposes differently. So it's not the same. You can get something you can say is close, like Roger Clark's published true color images. I just...don't like them. It's art at some point, you know? Edit: Looking further, this might be more helpful around the Orion nebula: http://clarkvision.com/articles/colo...rstellar.dust/ Kind of want revise my prior image, but who knows. Still a pain. __________________ The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. - Ecclesiastes 10:2 Last edited by RFtinkerer : Oct 23, 2018 at 03:15 PM.

Oct 24, 2018, 07:29 PM	#13032
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	Haven't really had the chance to use the Df but caught this rainfall over a soccer-field yesterday. I only havr the 50 1.8G right now. It wasn't on my radar(yet anyways) but my newly inquired immaculate nikkor 300 2.8 VRii is on the way. Both my kids play soccer and my GF's 3 sons play soccer. Two in travel and 1 in college. So I'll be shooting a **** ton of it. If the Df can't keep up I may sell it and buy a D4. I think I'll be fine though as I was never one to spray and prey shots. I usually time my shots with single clicks. __________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Oct 26, 2018, 10:38 PM	#13034
lmchv Planet Express Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Lima / Peru Posts: 3,769	A couple of pics from my trip to Cuzco. Machu Picchu! __________________ BEHEMOTH (Desktop): Asus ROG Maximus XI Formula \| Intel Core i9 9900K @5.0Ghz + Asus ROG Ryuo 240 \| Corsair Ballistic 32GB DDR4-3000 \| Dell 2715Q 27" 4K \| XFX Radeon VII 16GB \| CoolerMaster Cosmos C700P + Asus ROG Thor 1200W Platinum \| Sound Blaster Z + Logitech Z-5500 + Logitech G635 \| HyperX Alloy Elite RGB CherryMX Red + Logitech G700S + Gigabyte Krypton \| Samsung 950 Pro NVMe SSD 512GB + 2 x Samsung 850 Pro SSD 512GB RAID0 + 2 x Western Digital Black 1TB RAID0 \| LG BD-RE \| Windows 10 Pro 64bits Charquito (Desktop): Asus Sabertooth X99 \| Intel Core i7 5930K @4.7Ghz + Corsair Hydro H110 \| Kingston HyperX 32GB DDR4-2400 \| Dell U2713HM 27" \| Asus ROG Strix Geforce GTX1080\| Cooler Master Cosmos 2 + Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W \| Microsoft Reclusa + Logitech MX Performance \| Kingston HyperX 240GB SSD + Seagate 500GB \| Sony BD-ROM \| Windows 10 Pro 64bits Bloodzone.net Moderator

lmchv's System Specs
Motherboard	ASUS Maximus V Formula
CPU	Intel Core i7 3770K
Graphics	2 x XFX Radeon HD6970 2GB CF
Memory	16GB DDR3-1600 (4 x 4GB Corsair)
Cooling Solution	Corsair Hydro H100
Display	Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP
Soundcard & Speakers	Logitech Z-5500 + CM Storm Sirus + SupremeFX IV
Hard-Drives	OCZ Vortex 2 180GB SSD + 2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA2 RAID0
Optical Drives	Sony BD-ROM, LG DVD-writer
Power Supply	Thermaltake SP-850M
Case	Cooler Master Cosmos 1000
Input Devices	Microsoft Reclusa, Logitech MX Revolution, Microsoft XBOX gamepad, Logitech Cordless Rumblepad 2
Operating System	Windows 8 Pro 64bits

Oct 27, 2018, 09:09 AM	#13035
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	awesome! __________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Nov 2, 2018, 02:55 PM	#13036
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	Some Halloween shots, nothing special. All quick snaps as we walked on a crowded street. All with the 50 1.8g iso 12800 iso 12800 iso 9000 iso 8000 iso 1800 __________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Nov 4, 2018, 07:20 PM	#13037
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	__________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Nov 5, 2018, 11:13 AM	#13038
Mahjik Motoring Goodness Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Kansas City, MO Posts: 11,308	Nice! Using the new lens?

Nov 7, 2018, 06:34 PM	#13041
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	__________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Nov 7, 2018, 06:37 PM	#13042
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	__________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Nov 10, 2018, 11:19 AM	#13044
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	bluejay __________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Dec 7, 2018, 06:56 PM	#13045
Tyr-Sog Radeon Arctic Islands Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Michigan Posts: 11,996	__________________ Justin Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 5 G1 - nVidia Gigabyte RTX 3070 OC - Samsung EVO 850 SSD - Intel I5 6600K - crucial 16GB DDR4 - Intel 240ssd5 & WD 1TB 7200rpm - corsair 750ps - HP OMEN 27i - - corsair spec alpha carbide series case - corsair K70 Rapidfire RGB MX keyboard - Logitech G502 - Sennheiser G4ME One Headset MSI GE62 Apache Pro Gaming Laptop - nVidia 970m - Intel I7 5700 - 16GB DDR3 - 128ssd & 1TB 7200rpm XBone - TyrSog76 PSN - - Tyr-Sog_ Steam - Tyr-Sog

Dec 8, 2018, 07:21 PM	#13046
MasterGoa Life is not a task. Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: . Posts: 31,298	People will not realize how difficult those are to photograph Bit of front focus maybe?

Dec 9, 2018, 08:50 PM	#13048
MasterGoa Life is not a task. Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: . Posts: 31,298	Yeah, I got the 200-500mm with the D500 and it's quite a photon capturing tool Curiously though, the 200-500 is my only Nikon not made in Japan... But its excellent nonetheless...

Dec 21, 2018, 05:20 PM	#13050
MasterGoa Life is not a task. Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: . Posts: 31,298	Yeah. I have the 300AF-ED in 2.8 and it is a great lens, but it is true I do not take it out anymore...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
To anyone thats been in the "Official Digi Cam Pic Thread!"	Jasef	Off Topic Lounge	8	Feb 11, 2005 11:15 AM
another digi cam thread	Oscar1613	General Hardware	11	Jan 19, 2005 03:34 PM
Digi-Cam spinoff thread	chadro	Off Topic Lounge	5	Jun 16, 2004 02:47 PM
In REgards to the Digi cam thread...	JTF2	Off Topic Lounge	4	May 19, 2004 12:18 PM