I'm surprised it got that score from everything he said was wrong. It's like a passive aggressive review and from what I just read it sucks, but it's great because of x,y,z.
He kept referring to the MP being awesome and that's what the game is really about. It seems as if they pointed that review on the MP and not what the review was supposed to be about. That or EA said write it like this or else, which I wouldn't pass by them.