![]() |
|
|||||||
| CATALYST Drivers Discussion and Technical support forum for AMD's Catalyst Drivers. Please put Linux-specific driver posts and Remote Wonder discussion in their respective forums. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | Advertisement (Guests Only)
Login or Register to remove this ad
|
|
Hi There!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,221
|
It would seem that for newer Radeon cards under the newer CCC versions, there are a lot of options with regard to pixel format for output, black level expansion for video, etc....the problem is, consistent behavior across applications and various video sources is still elusive. It's not just me, there are plenty of threads over at avsforum concerning this issue. Being as these settings are specifically there to enable output to a television under various conditions, I would like to see ATI clarify in some way the changes to the processing of video sources, including the Windows desktop, under various settings in the Catalyst Control Center...After experiencing what it's like to try and get consistent behavior from a Radeon-equipped PC connected to a television, specifically with regard to color space conversion or levels expansion from 16-235 sources (DVD, Bluray, basically all commercial video), I'd really like someone, anyone, at ATI to clarify the following: 1. For each of the "pixel format" settings under the CCC, what does each selection do with the desktop with regard to conversion to/from the card's "native" RGB? 2. For each of the "pixel format" settings under the CCC, what does each selection do to video sources with regard to conversions from YV12 or other format to/from the selected format, and any intermediaries (like the card's "native" RGB), and does this take place for all possible video renderers, or only some, and what should I, as a user, expect to see from my various video software players? If I am connected to a tv expecting black at 16, what do I need to set my software player up to do, generally, to enjoy video on the tv at "proper" black levels/color space, for each of the pixel format selections? 3. I understand there is a dynamic range setting under the new CCC for 5xxx series cards...what does this do, with regards to levels expansion, in conjunction with each of the above pixel format settings? Does it work for all video renderers for all sources, or just some? Where does the expansion or lack thereof occur in the signal chain? In other words, I (and many, many other users as evidenced by the size and frequency of posts about black levels on ATI cards over at avsforums) want to know, mechanically, what each of these settings does. I want to know how many conversions are happening with regard to color space for each setting, and where in the processing chain they occur under various output conditions. In other words, we need a white paper with a chart or diagram showing, at a driver/processing chain level, what is happening between the media and the output of our cards. These settings are there to enable the best possible experience when outputting to something other than a PC monitor, and I shouldn't, as a user, have to guess at what they do, how it is done, and where in the processing chain the action occurs. I understand that there is a myriad of third-party video playback software out there, and that each can throw its own set of wrenches in the mix....but I don't think ATI is holding up their end of the bargain with regard to specifying what their own settings are designed to do. So far as I can tell, there are no hover-over pop-up hints, no explanation in the help file beyond that which is already self-evident in CCC, and no information on the limitations/benefits of each setting and where it occurs in the chain. This is inexcusable...there can be no doubt that some engineer somewhere had to justify the presence of each new setting in CCC, no doubt that their utility and logical place in the processing chain had to be explained to someone, somewhere, no doubt there are some logical scenarios under which one would want to use those settings...so explain! By way of example: If I select pixel format "YCbCr 4:2:2" in CCC, does the card pass blu-ray source video unmolested from disc to hdmi output, or does the card convert to/from native RGB in an intermediate step? Do I have to specify "no levels expansion" to my video player software when this setting is engaged? Do I still have to specify black level under Avivo settings when this format is engaged, or is it assumed that selecting the format indicates that no level expansion is desired? Does the pixel format conversion take place before or after other processing by the software player? Which pixel format setting gives me the most accurate output for bluray sources when connected to a television? I have no way of knowing the answers to these simple questions from the info provided by ATI.
__________________
Last edited by HiThere : Feb 2, 2010 at 11:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
zero-zero
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Toronto
Posts: 3,468
|
well, the hard way is to manually test the diff combos of options... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Radeon HD 5770
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 281
|
FWIW I think a lot of stuff under the Avivo umbrella falls short of being omnipotent... If you've got video source that's already full range vs partial, or worse, with the US broadcast black level makes a difference. Whatever decodes the video, & how it interacts with Avivo, if at all, makes a difference. If in the process of decoding/displaying the video there's transcoding going on (i.e. a lot of streaming solutions), that makes a difference. What CCC settings are enabled in the registry (& which ones work with your card), & what they're set to can make a difference. Add to that ATI is evolving Avivo, where some settings that used to be available & appeared to work (at least somewhat in my experience) like Dynamic Range don't with 10.1. [I normally check Avivo separately with each driver version so I can go back somewhat by simply replacing a couple (or 4) files (...Common Files\ATI Technologies\Multimedia), though it's not foolproof.] Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by mikiem : Feb 3, 2010 at 02:12 PM. Reason: typo |
||
|
|
|
| Advertisement (Guests Only) |
|
Login or Register to remove this ad
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
Hi There!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,221
|
First, thanks for all the info, I'm glad someone decided to chime in on it, and grateful for the help... Quote:
The way I see it, somewhere along the line, an engineer had to explain the inclusion of these settings in CCC to a manager's manager, and perform testing of the settings under various scenarios, or he wouldn't have been authorized to charge time to the project, or add the check box to CCC... Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Last edited by HiThere : Feb 3, 2010 at 09:45 PM. |
|||
|
|
|